More evidence that we need a pension tax

Posted on

The Guardian has reported:

Britain's biggest company pension funds are facing their largest ever collective shortfall of £100bn as a result of the financial crisis, in a stark reminder of the difficulties of funding retirement for an ageing population.

The deficit is more than double the £41bn estimated for the FTSE 100 companies a year ago, according to a new report by actuaries Lane Clark & Peacock.

This is just more evidence that firstly we can’t fund our pensions the way we do now, secondly that investing pension funds in the FTSE won’t solve the pensions problem, however much it is artificially reflated, and thirdly that the idea that the stock market has any bearing to any economic reality we want to depend upon is absurd (bar the sure fact that the City will gamble in it for their own benefit but that of no one else).

We need to look at pensions afresh.

I’ve done that here and suggest this just adds further evidence to support the arguments I’ve made.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social