FT.com / Comment / Opinion - Markets can be wrong and the price is not always right.
Richard Thaler in the FT:
I recently had the pleasure of reading Justin Fox’s new book The Myth of the Rational Market . The book was mostly written before the financial crisis . However, it is natural to ask if the experiences over the last year should change our view of the EMH.
It helps to start with a quick review of rational finance. Modern finance began in the 1950s when many of the great economists of the second half of the 20th century began their careers. The previous generation of economists, such as John Maynard Keynes, were less formal in their writing and less tied to rationality as their underlying tool. This is no accident. As economics began to stress mathematical models, economists found that the simplest models to solve were those that assumed everyone in the economy was rational. This is similar to doing physics without bothering with the messy bits caused by friction. Modern finance followed this trend.
And amazinglty most economists are still doing just that. Taking the easy bits, applying their neat little formulas and saying the world's just fine, when it's very, very broke.
Three things economists really have to learn:
a) inadequate maths proves nothing
b) the absence of data is not the absence of evidence of a problem
c) Finding statistical signifcance in a correlation is not the same as finding significance, let alone cause.
But this has not occurred to the vast majority of them.
No wonder we're in a mess.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
Great article by Richard Thaler.
The main message is that prices get so far out of line from underlying fundamentals (as in the recent credit bubble) that capitalism can lead to a massive misallocation of resources – and consequent crash.
Not a new insight (Keynes nailed this down over 70 years ago) but stated about as clearly as I’ve seen anybody manage.
The other guy who writes really well about this stuff (as well as many other economics topics) is the Australian economist Steve Keen, who has a chapter in his book “Debunking Economics” on the Efficient Markets Hypothesis which is well worth reading.
Howard
Steve Keen is essential reading!
Richard
[…] Tax Research UK » Markets can be wrong […]
The lesson of this for any semi-intelligent person is that the right wing neoliberal doctrine that the City, Tory and New Labour governments have followed for the last 30 years is wrong: the market does not always know best, the private sector does not always do things better than the public sector, and so on.
However, do you see any acknowledgement of this from the bankers and politicians? Not a bit, the bankers are as arrogant and greedy as ever, and the politicians do nothing to put them in their place.