Cuts cost

Posted on

As the Guardian notes this morning flood defences in places like the Somerset levels and Dawlish were abandoned because of the cuts.

The cost to society will now be considerably more than the supposed savings made.

Cuts cost money.

That is especially true when borrowing was available at an effective 0% interest rate at the time these 'savings' were made, and people who could have undertaken the work were being made redundant.

Surely the false logic of austerity is now becoming apparent and the idea that we exist solely to service debt is becoming an obvious falsehood?

Or will the right still persist in their argument that we cannot afford things that generations have enjoyed and which we could still have if only we got our priorities right?

 

 


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social