When James Murdoch can get a 95% vote of support we know institutional shareholders are failing us, badly

Posted on

As the FT's reported this morning:

A total of 95 per cent of shareholders voted to re­appoint Mr Murdoch as a non-executive director of the broadcaster on Thursday, despite calls from shareholder groups, such as Pensions & Investment Research Consultants, to vote against his reinstatement.

When such a vote can happen the one thing we can be sure of is that institutional shareholders do not give a damn for good governance, their investors' opinion or for the upholding of law and order.

Which is why I think the time for radical improvement in the quality of reporting and governance at pension and life assurance funds is long overdue. These funds have long been captured by the City for the benefit of the City. That has to stop.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social