Yesterday was Sunday, and so Jacqueline and I did, as seems to be our habit, discuss quantum-related issues, partly with the need to post chapter 4 of the Quantum Biology series in mind. However, for all sorts of good reasons, we are still refining that, even though almost all the key decisions have now been made. So we agreed to offer this instead of a Quantum Essay.
Other essays in this series:
- The Quantum Economics series (this link opens a tab with them all in it)
- The Quantum Essays: Observing and Engaging
- The Quantum Essays: Quantum MMT: The wave function of sovereign spending
- The Quantum Essays: Is equilibrium only possible in death?
- The Quantum essays: Economics, the Big Bang and Rachel Reeves
- The Quantum Essays: Quantum economics, discounting, and the cost of inaction
- The Quantum Essays: Schrödinger, entropy, equilibrium, and the lessons for society
- The Quantum Essays: The meaning of life, negentropy, and the politics of staying alive
- The Quantum Essays: Democracy as negentropy: why fascism is the politics of death
- The Quantum Essays: Where are the checks on entropy in the US system now?
- The Quantum Essays: Where are the checks on entropy in the UK system now?
- The Quantum Essays: The quantum difference between work and speculation
- Quantum(ish) Essay: What if Darwin was wrong? The case for the survival of the wisest
Comments
When commenting, please take note of this blog's comment policy, which is available here. Contravening this policy will result in comments being deleted before or after initial publication at the editor's sole discretion and without explanation being required or offered.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

I think Flanders & Swann have helped me to understand why so little that is useful, comes out of Starmer’s cold-hearted Labour Party. It isn’t working.
Thank you.
This labour government knows no heat, has no dynamics and does not work. They adhere to static equilibrium of the past. They are stuck fast, petrified of change. Yes we can? No we can’t and we won’t.
F and S – great stuff!
Funnily enough , on a Sunday we have still not reached that state of needing to discuss Quantum – related issues. Maybe we will one day.
Can you do one with Tom Lehrer?
I don’t know his music – direct me to where I should be looking.
All on YouTube. Try Pollution, Vatican Rag, Whos; Next, National Brotherhood Week. Many people love the Elements song, which is one of the few with no political point.
Thanks
My father loved Tom Lehrer’s music so I was brought up listening to it. He was a mathematician and musician who I am amazed to just discover (thank you John Boxall) died this year aged 97. In 2022 he relinquished all rights over his music so that it would be available free in the public domain and made it available to all for download and streaming here:
https://tomlehrersongs.com
This is his Wikipedia page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Lehrer
Thanks
Thinking about it you might not approve of
Poisoning Pigeons in the Park
No!