The 1933 Nazi Playbook That Explains Why ABC Cancelled Kimmel

Posted on

This is too important, and frightening, not to share:

The speaker is Tad Stoermer, an academic historian who suggests he is:

  • Torching lies
  • Teaching resistance
  • Explaining revolution.

He is the author of 'A Resistance History of the United States' (Steerforth Press, 2026). He is a
lecturer at Johns Hopkins University and a visiting scholar at the University of Southern Denmark.

This is a summary of the transcript, produced by AI:


Summary — Trump declared “Antifa” terrorists

(video by Todd Sturmer)

TL;DR: Todd Stoermer argues that after Trump labelled “Antifa” terrorists, major institutions (media, corporations, universities, unions) rushed to demonstrate loyalty — voluntarily pre-empting dissent in a pattern he likens to the Nazi-era tactic of coordinated self-submission (Gleichschaltung). That vagueness — designating an idea rather than an organisation — creates a chilling, pre-emptive machinery of repression where everyone polices everyone else.

Key points

  1. Trigger event: Trump labels anti-fascist activists (“Antifa”) as terrorists; within days ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel and other outlets pre-empted or altered programming, Sinclair even scheduling a tribute special and demanding apologies/donations.

  2. Corporate race to comply: Media owners (and other institutions) aren't being ordered — they're competing to show loyalty (partly for reasons like pending FCC approvals/mergers), demonstrating the speed and voluntariness of the response.

  3. Historical analogy — Nazi playbook: Sturmer invokes the Nazi tactic of making examples and letting the rest of civic life align itself voluntarily. He stresses the mechanism: ambiguity + fear = institutions self-purging to prove loyalty.

  4. Ambiguity weaponised: “Antifa” is, he says, a mentality or way of thinking rather than a formal organisation, so declaring it a terrorist threat lets institutions define the danger loosely and punish or ostracise anyone perceived as connected.

  5. Social enforcement: Celebrities, sports teams, corporate boards and HR departments issue identical statements and policing, while activists launch campaigns to get people fired, producing pre-emptive censure without legal definitions or trials.

  6. Universities and workplaces at risk: Examples of firings/audits are cited; academic syllabi and social media histories become grounds for punishment if someone is marked “Antifa-adjacent.”

  7. A faster, digital danger: Sturmer warns this process is quicker and more absolute than 1933 because digital records, corporate liability, and social media accelerate detection and punishment — institutions “volunteer” repression rather than being forced.

  8. Closing warning: The constitution and institutional safeguards are weakened not by a single violent purge but by institutions racing to prove allegiance — creating the infrastructure of repression through compliance rather than coercion.

Tone/intent: The video is a polemical, alarmed warning — drawing historical parallels to warn that voluntary institutional compliance driven by vague accusations can erode civic freedoms rapidly.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social