After a year of challenging the political status quo, it's time for something new. In this video, I explain how this channel is evolving — more content, more community, and new ways to get involved. Let us know what you think.
This is the audio version:
This is the transcript:
Everything must change.
As a matter of fact, we humans do, and everything around us changes all the time, which we all know. The only people who pretend otherwise are those who want to maintain the status quo on behalf of those who are in power, who think that society as it is suits them very well.
But I'm not one of those people, and it is time to think about some changes in this YouTube channel.
We started a year ago. We got a lot of things wrong at first, and we'll admit that. And then we found a niche. Since last October, we've been criticising the status quo, whether it's Trump or Reeves, the single transferable party, or the political system as a whole, we've had a go at it here, and I'm not apologising for that.
In fact, it's been a lot of fun, and it seems that others have enjoyed what we've been doing because, over that period, we've had nearly 25 million views of our videos, and we've got more than 200,000 followers as a result. And we are grateful to every one of you who has clicked that button because getting that sort of feedback does make a difference when you are a YouTube creator, I promise you. If you haven't clicked already, please do because we will feel better as a consequence. And if that's your good deed for the day, thank you very much.
But there are very clear signs right across politics that people are getting fatigued with the way things are.
Trump is no longer exciting. He's threatening, alright. He's deeply dangerous, and we all know that, but he's no longer attracting the attention that he did because the novelty of his madness is wearing off.
We also know that Rachel Reeves is hopeless. Now, however many times we say it, she will remain hopeless because it is clear she has no intention of changing. That won't stop me pointing it out, but I do understand that there are only so many times you can do so.
And we also now know that Keir Starmer is the worst Prime Minister that we've had for decades, certainly worse than every Tory who went before him since 2010.
So the question is, why do we need to keep telling that story? Or is it time that we begin to do something more?
We've had a long discussion on that here, and we've decided that, yes, we do need to do something more now, and so we are planning to change things a bit.
We are still going to produce those long-form videos that you've got used to from us; those which last 10 or more minutes and discuss a situation in some depth, but there are going to be two or three a week of those now.
In addition, we're going to produce shorter videos on other days, which are going to concentrate on some key political and economic ideas.
What is GDP, for example?
Or do fiscal rules make any sense?
And is modern monetary theory a miracle cure?
And is Trump really a fascist?
In response to this video, you could really help us by telling us some of the questions you'd like us to answer, but please do make them short, make them specific, and make them ones that will appeal to lots of people because, clearly, we can't make something which is deeply isolated in its appeal.
We also want to involve you a bit more than just doing that. So once a week, we're going to create a video that will pose a question and which will provide answers: up to four answers in most cases. We will ask you to vote on those answers in the poll section below the video. That will provide us with valuable feedback on what you are thinking. And again, we'll appreciate that.
We also want to turn this into something which is a bit more like a community. We're at the early stages of our thinking on this, but we might be launching a membership scheme, partly because it does cost quite a lot of money to create these videos, and it would be great to have some support because we are expanding and we think that's going to cost a bit more, but also because we want to provide some people with insight into how we actually create these videos, and as importantly, why we make videos, and if you've got any comments on those ideas, let me know, below.
Finally, we will definitely be looking at introducing a podcast, and that should happen in the next few weeks, with the aim of producing one about once a week, on average. The format is something that we'll disclose in a little while, but it probably won't have lots of guests. It'll be more like a question-and-answer session, but we'll see how that goes.
The consequence of all this is that there will be more content on this YouTube channel in the future, and we now have the time to produce that. My retirement from academic work, which is partial, but nonetheless real in terms of time commitment, will permit that, and I find making these videos both exciting and rewarding, and I hope that comes across.
The result will be that we will also create more content that will be more varied and that will be quite deliberate, and you will be invited to participate more.
We hope you enjoy the new content even more than you have already. But there's one other thing to add, and that is if you do like the content here, click below the video to the section which says more, and you will find that on every video there will now be a link to the Funding the Future blog, which I write. And on that link, you will find that there is a specific URL which will take you to a blog post, which will provide you with a transcript of the video in question, including this one. And there, you'll be able to not only read this but also see comments that are made.
There will also, in the future, probably be some ChatGPT links there to assist you in finding other materials which are of a similar style or to help you provide activist interventions as a consequence of what you've heard. So, those will give you one way of interacting.
And another way we'll provide for you to interact is by providing revamped playlists in the future so that you can find our best content more easily as a result.
Please do subscribe if you haven't already, and if you would like to make a donation, click the Kofi button; there's a link down below, or go to my blog, and it's very apparent where it is there. So, all things considered, that's what we think you need to know about what we are planning now.
But if there's anything you want to tell us, please do, although I'm afraid to say, given the number of comments we get, we won't be able to respond to everyone.
Thank you. We really appreciate your support and your feedback. All of which is important to us because that will help us make better content for you, and ultimately, that is what matters.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
I would be very interested in an explanation of what damage, or otherwise, the bond market could do to “punish” the government as is so often alleged.
I did this recently, but I might do it again.
Britain has plenty of people offering analysis of its problems. The mainstream media feeds off it.
What is needed is sensible discussion of possible solutions. The political parties largely avoid solutions, because all possible solutions involve curtailing absolute power. Solutions have to range widely across governance, finance, economics, law, education, and public participation, to name a few. Most of the think tanks are underwhelming.
Personally I rarely watch videos or listen to podcasts, preferring the written word.
There is almost no overlap, it seems, between our video and blog audiences.
I only use your blogs mainly as I am a speed reader and can read at least twice as fast as speaking so it saves time.
These all sound like exciting developments and I look forward to seeing what emerges, but… ChatGPT? Seriously? I know you find it useful, but should you really be promoting a technology so damaging to the environment? One so intimately linked to the fortunes of the techbros you despise? It took you longer than it should have to abandon Twitter; please don’t make the same mistake again. Sometimes one has to take a moral stand, even if it makes life a little harder.
Yes, in a word.
I should be.
I explained why.
I live in the real world.
And I drive a car, and create YouTubes, which burn vastly more power.
Good morning
After the debacles of Truss and Johnson, and the Brexit chaos and disastrous austerity of Cameron and May, is it really true that “Keir Starmer is the worst Prime Minister that we’ve had for decades, certainly worse than every Tory who went before him since 2010”?
I agree that Starmer has been a disappointment – the mistakes, U-turns and lack of vision and political nous has been alarming – but I think it’s a stretch to dismiss him as worse than the Tory PMs all of whom made the UK a worse place to live for ordinary people
Starmer may improve but even if he doesn’t the problem with the constant sniping at him is that we end up with a one term government, more political and economic turmoil and Farage in No 10. And I assume that for many people on the left that’s the last thing we want.
My answer is, yes he is.
They said they’d do what they did.
He claimed he would do things he is now refusing to deliver.
In my book, that’s worse.
And I see no way Starmer can keep Farage out of No.10. Others might though.
But pelase don’t tell me I have to support Starmer to keep Farage out when his government is decidely further to the right than Cameron was.
An area that really fascinates me is the chaos appearing in systems everywhere. From here in Spain, family in Argentina, friends in East and West USA, family /friends in UK, more in Australia and other parts of Europe, I hear near daily stories of the non functioning of things. Banks, local government, companies, online stuff, new law failures/ with unintended consequences etc. All with the open mouthed “you could not make this up”, and “Computer Says No”. So I’d love to hear more about is this for real ? And have we basically become so overcomplicated that “it” cannot be expected to work ? Or why are we in this era of hyper normalisation of such chaos ?
Good question. Noted.
If Starmer and Farage are “unelectable” what’s the alternative – as it stands Badenoch or Davey or the Greens? Perhaps not to vote at all
I video is coming on this.
I would like a video on how banks “create” money because I don’t understand it as well as I would like but also think two polar opposite myths, that banks can simply just create as much money as they want on the one hand and are completely constrained by first deposits on the other, need to be slain. I think when people understand it even to the limited extent I do, they will become more alert to the importance of where they bank.
Noted. I will do it, although I can’t say when.
I would appreciate a series of discussions on how we might best transition from peak oil to renewables economically. Including realistic timeframes and economies of scale and just what all of us will need to change in our consumer based lives to expidite ecological survival.
Thanks.
Noted
I had not got that
A short talk on the effect of increased government spending on international currency markets would be helpful. I keep being told that the value of the pound would decrease and people wouldn’t be able to afford imports any more.
I will do
It may seem very simple but I think using average earnings as a general statistic is wrong. A short explanation of median or mode earnings would be useful for discussions with people who can’t see why they are not better off
Noted…