Reducing nothing to nothing is nothing

Posted on

As the FT reports this morning:

George Osborne has reassured companies that they will not be forced to raise wages to offset £12bn of benefit cuts to the working poor, as he puts the finishing touches to this week’s Budget.

To put it another way, George Osborne is going to cut benefits for those on the lowest pay but who are in work and do nothing at all to increase the minimum wage, the net effect of which is a guaranteed increase in poverty.

He argues that cutting tax is his alternative. This, however, makes no sense at all: he must know that 6 million people in receipt of in work benefits do not pay tax so there is no compensation for them from any such cuts he may offer. After all, reducing nothing to nothing is nothing. And that, it seems, is what the government will expect people to live on. 


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social