I make a point of trying to disclose conflicts of interest, sources of funding, potential bias and so on on this blog since you can hardly argue for transparency and not do so.
So in that spirit I should disclose that I learned today that my application to formally rejoin the Quakers has been accepted. It's material to me, so I disclose it in case it is material to anyone else's understanding of what I write.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
I was invited to my first Quaker meeting when visiting Devon in 2010. They were, as one might expect, mainly Middle class and over 50. Into this group came a big chap, shaven head, tattoos, mustache, leathers, accompanied by his lady also with leathers and tattoos. They joined in what seemed to me to be like a meditation group (with which I am familiar ). After the meeting they had tea and then left on a gleaming chrome and black motor cycle.
Several weeks later I saw a friend of mine who has been Quaker for some years. I told her my tale and she said ‘we accept anyone’ and the smile said ‘even you, Ian.’
The ability to see through the masks of the personality and recognise and respond to the true self-or divine-or the consciousness we all share, is at the heart of real spirituality.
I have only been to one meeting since but I think if you wish to pursue a spiritual path, the Friends would be one of the best places to do so.
Does it sound cliquey for a fellow Quaker to say, with a big Ffriendly smile, welcome back, Richard?
M
Oh I think we’re broad minded enough to not be considered cliquey!
Thanks
In Friendship