Tax and corruption

Posted on

Dennis Howlett and I have an interesting relationship. We are both natural bloggers. Sometimes we agree: sometimes we don't!

Dennis has commented on 'Closing the Floodgates' at his place. One comment I found curious. He said:

There are some weaknesses in the argument. It depends on a definition of 'corruption' that embraces commercial activities that while logical is far from universally accepted as appropriate.

The definition we use is logical. It's not accepted because it's new. But that's the case with all new ideas. The fact is, that if they're logical they often are accepted. We think this one will be.

No, it's more than that. We're sure this one will be. To read more, go here.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social