Banker contempt

Posted on

FT Alphaville has reported this morning that:

A senior UBS private banker allegedly sanctioned the creation of an illegal offshore investment vehicle for one of India's most powerful businessmen, saying that Anil Ambani's status as a “mega-client” could justify waiving the rules, a London tribunal has been told.

The FT says the claim, contained in email evidence submitted to the hearing this week, has been made in a case brought against two of UBS's former wealth management executives by the UK's financial regulator.

The evidence shows that Kurt Kumschick, the Swiss bank's recently deceased former marketing head for wealth management in the India-Pacific region, told two junior colleagues that whether the bank should create the Mauritius-based investment vehicle for Mr Ambani would be a “business decision” if the bank could not confirm its legality under Indian law. Mr Kumschick died this week, according to UBS officials. His estate has no representation at the tribunal.

Now, I stress, it's just an allegation.

But we've seen this attitude to the law too often from financial services companies. And the penalties need to be very high indeed.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social