It's time to talk about what I've been doing in DC.
I've been attending the first meeting of the Co-ordinating Committee of the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development . This task force is being administered in DC by my good friends at Global Financial Integrity (GFI), but its importance is the unique way in which it brings together civil society (currently represented by GFI, the Tax Justice Network and Global Witness) and a great many governments to work together to tackle the multiple problems we face in developing a transparent economic system. As the press release issued after our meeting said:
A unique global coalition of civil society organizations and more than 50 governments was launched today to address the inequalities in the financial system that penalize billions of people. The Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development advocates for greatly improved transparency and accountability in the global financial system. The opacity and complexity of the financial system, enabled by financial institutions, laundering techniques and more than 70 secrecy jurisdictions, is at the heart of the current financial crisis and significantly impedes the ability of poor countries to develop their economies.
"The Task Force will promote increased transparency and international cooperation to enhance the integrity and governance of markets," said Raymond Baker who is Director of Washington, DC-based Global Financial Integrity which heads the Task Force. According to John Christensen of the Tax Justice Network in London, "Illicit financial flows drain money out of poor countries, enable criminal activity, and undermine international development." Julien Meimon of the Leading Group on Solidarity Levies to Fund Development noted that "the explicit goal is to facilitate innovative financing mechanisms to ensure a fair share of the world's resources are made available to its poorest people especially in developing countries."
The Task Force advocates:
• That systems be put in place to curtail the practice of mispricing trade;
• That country-by-country reporting of sales profits and tax paid by multinational corporations be required in audited annual reports and tax returns;
• That the beneficial ownership, control and accounts of companies, trusts and foundations be readily available on public record to facilitate due diligence;
• That automatic exchange of information between tax and governmental authorities on income, gains and property received by non-resident individuals, corporations, and trusts, be made mandatory;
• That predicate offenses for a money laundering charge be harmonized and codified.
Norway is the first funder of the Task Force and Harald Tollan from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that "the Task Force is a natural extension of Development Minister Erik Solheim's focus on the damaging effects of illicit financial flows, and the continuation of the constructive partnership formed by civil society, international organizations and governments under the Norwegian-led efforts to address illicit financial flows."
Dorothee Richter, from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, noted that "the new coalition is indispensable in the fight against illicit financial flows. Our initiative at the International Tax Compact strongly supports the work of the Task Force."In the near term the Task Force will focus on the April meeting of G20 nations in London to promote its agenda with governments.
I want to add to that though some thoughts I offered in my concluding remarks to the meeting. A few years ago a few us in a number of different countries set out on a journey to tackle the problems secrecy jurisdictions and the financial architecture that supports them cause within our own economies and most especially for the poorest people and developing countries of the world. People can say what they will of us, but it's clear we travelled in hope, and in the face of considerable opposition from those whose behaviour we questioned. To have the explicit backing of several governments present at the meeting, both financially and explicitly, plus the clear support from the more than fifty nations aligned to the Leading Group of Nations, ably represented by France in DC, is an extraordinary boost to the partnership we are seeking to create that wants to create a new financial architecture that can be integrated into a sustainable future economy.
It was a good time to do this. DC is clearly very excited about the inauguration of Obama, and rightly so I think. As one well informed commentator at the meeting put it, we might now see a US administration that recognises the real need for reform in this area.
But let's just borrow a phrase from Obama for a moment. We left our meeting quite sure that if asked if we can deliver the reform that is essential in this area we can reply "Yes we can".
And we mean it.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Congratulations and good luck…or should we in the developing countries sucking on the hind tit of developmental aid say “Happy Hunting’…
The list makes very interesting reading. Some jurisdictions turn up very frequently, others only very occasionally.
Of the major nil-tax offshore jurisdictions (i.e. without any doible tax treaty networks), take a look at the following numbers of companies with subsidiaries and total number of subsidiaries broken down per jurisdiction.
Out of 200 companies on the two lists, between them they have a total of 3,581 offshore subsidiaries (17.5 each).
1. Bermuda. 86 companies (43%) have a total of 364 subsidiaries there, making up 10.16% of the overall total.
2. Cayman. 69 companies (34.5%) have 661 (18.46%) of the subsidiaries there, which makes it the most-used jurisdiction in terms of number of subsidiaries.
3. BVI. 30 companies (15%) have 152 (4.24%) of the subsidiaries there.
By contrast in Guernsey 9 companies (4.5%) have 23 (0.64%) of the subsidiaries, in Jersey 7 companies (3.5%) have 39 (1.09%) of the subsidiaries while in the Isle of Man just 2 companies (15) 2 companies (1%) have 2 subsidiaries (0.06%).
33% of the total offshore nil-tax subsidiaries are based in Cayman, Bermuda and the BVI combined, while just 1.79% are held in Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man combined. Geography must have something to do with this differential but its a massive one.
David
That’s a US company list
It would be quite different for UK companies
Richard
Richard
Perhaps, although I’m not totally convinced of that. Obviously yes in the pure financial services sector, but not for the broader economic sectors (ie comparable with the US list). Its far more likely that UK companies would be structuring their overseas activities via Dutch and Luxembourg intermediate holding companies due to the lack of any helpful double tax treaties with Jersey, Guernsey or the Isle of Man. The amount of corporate work of this nature in the three islands is I think very minimal these days compared with 10-15 years ago.
[…] UK has failed to join a new international crackdown on financial secrecy and tax havens by more than 50 countries, including Germany, France and Spain – part of a package of measures to […]
[…] at what we committed to at the Task Force meeting on Financial Integrity and Transparency last […]
[…] UK has failed to join a new international crackdown on financial secrecy and tax havens by more than 50 countries, including Germany, France and Spain – part of a package of measures to […]
[…] anti-corruption leader Transparency International (TI) is the newest member to join the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development, Global Financial Integrity (GFI) announced […]