It’s been rumoured that the TUC is to be included in Alastair Darling’s review of corporation tax.
I can confirm, the rumour is true.
That’s one down.
Now, how about civil society as well?
I know it’s the start of Christian Aid week, and I know they’re talking about tax, but it also seems to be tax avoidance day in the Guardian.
They point out that those seeking to get round the government’s proposed new rules for taxing the foreign income of companies by moving to Ireland are tax avoiders, increasing the Missing Billions.
They highlight the Christian Aid report.
Michael Meacher on Comment is Free refers to the role of tax avoidance in undermining the credibility of tax systems, and in increasing the wealth gap.
I’d make every Monday tax avoidance day. It would remind the accountants, lawyers and bankers of the world of the harm they cause. Harm that means 1,000 children will die today for lack of resources that could have been provided if tax had been paid by the clients of those professions.
This is Christian Aid week in the UK.
Christian Aid launches its annual report linked to that week today. It is called Death and Taxes.
As they say:
The lives of 1,000 young children a day are being lost to disease and poverty in poor countries because of illegal trade-related tax evasion, says a new report from Christian Aid.
It has calculated that this evasion costs the developing world at least US$160bn in lost revenue annually. The culprits are companies using false accounting to reduce their tax liability.
If that money was allocated according to current spending patterns, the lives of 350,000 children under the age of five, 250,000 of them infants, could be saved every year.The sum is almost one and a half times the amount given as aid to the developing world every year. If the amount that is also lost through legal tax avoidance dodges were added, it would be many times greater.
Christian Aid’s report, Death and taxes: the true toll of tax dodging, looks at the impact of tax dodging, both legal and illegal, on the developing world. It blames the secrecy offered by more than 70 tax havens for widespread abuses, and highlights the role of facilitators, including the big accountancy firms, in promoting their use.
That’s hard hitting. I think it appropriate. And the Big 4 and their like cannot deny their role: they are in all the major havens, including the likes of Liechtenstein.
Those who facilitate international tax avoidance, let alone evasion (and many will not know which they are doing - partly because the claim that accountants make that there is a distinct dividing line is wholly untrue, especially when you are only dealing with one aspect of a web of transactions) should think hard. They will be directly contributing to the death of children.
The report can be downloaded here.
Please read it.
Disclosure: I contributed to this report. I will be speaking at its launch tonight.
The Times has an article on HMRC seeking to crack the problem of Swiss tax evasion. It’s good that they are. It’s good that it’s being reported. By working with Germany HMRC have a chance of success. Thank heavens that the UK is realising a multilateral approach is essential.
But who is quoted in the middle of the article promoting the only places that continue to guarantee anonymity for tax evaders? Why, it’s that regular friend of tax avoiders, Mike Warburton of Grant Thornton: a man who once said there is no morality in taxation, and who goes out of his way to prove it.
I could have bookmarked Simon Caulkin’s article in the Observer today.
I can’t. It’s too good.
Few people hit the nail on the head as often as he does.
I took part in the World this Weekend today on BBC Radio 4. (The link is here, for the next few days, start 20 minutes into the programme). The debate was on the claimed loss to the Exchequer from companies leaving the UK.
My contribution followed that of Richard Baron, head of tax at the Institute of Directors. I have to be candid: Baron’s comments were absolutely farcical. First of all he showed no recognition that the planned change in taxation of foreign dividends has happened because business has asked for it. Second he defended tax competition as if it is inevitable, and as if it were the same as the competition between supermarkets. Third he suggested shareholder value has much greater status than any duty to the state. He showed no understanding at all that there might be a taxation dimension to corporate social responsibility.
I will be as polite as I can: he showed himself a person who has done no analysis, who has no comprehension and who has no understanding of the context in which business operates.
I would refer him to Simon Caulkin in the Observer today, who said:
Capitalism, as is now clear, has most to fear from capitalists.
He’s right. John McFall MP who concluded the debate showed he did understand the issues. The root of this issue he said is the concept of fairness in taxation.
The Tax Justice Network for Africa issued this press release today:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 10, 2008
Lusaka, Zambia
Africa has lost $607 billion (US).
Equitable taxation not aid will end the looting of Africa: Tax Justice Network for Africa
Africa’s revolving door
Capital flight from Africa is devastating development at an alarming rate. It deprives Africa of investment and further exacerbates the gap between the North and South and also between rich and poor people. 35 civil society representatives from 13 southern African and 2 European Countries gathered in Lusaka to discuss strategies to combat revenue leakages in Africa. They met under the banner of the Tax Justice Network for Africa (TJN-A), which was established in 2007 at the World Social Forum in Nairobi.
Addressing the meeting hosted by the Civil Society Trade Network of Zambia (CSTNZ), John Christensen, the Director of the Tax Justice Network International, revealed that $607 billion (US) has been shifted out of Africa over the last three decades. This is depriving Africa of investment and tax revenues that it needs to fund its own development. According to Mr Christensen: “Since the 1970’s, for every dollar in external loans to Africa roughly 60 cents left as capital flight in the same year. For example Zambia has lost 19.8 billion dollars in capital flight representing 272% of the debt stock as at 2004.”
Mr Christensen also cited other examples of Southern African countries experiencing massive capital flight and external debt: Angola has experienced 50 billion dollars of capital flight representing 535% of that country’s external debt. Over the same period, Zimbabwe has lost almost 25 billion dollars, more than 5 times the value of its external debt. The figure for Swaziland stands at 1.3 billion dollars and Lesotho has lost 893 million dollars.
Alvin Mosioma, who coordinates the activities of Tax Justice Network for Africa, said: “Africa is particularly vulnerable to capital flight, tax avoidance and evasion. African leaders must take urgent steps in a concerted political effort to seal the loopholes that are haemorrhaging the outflow of resources from Africa and protect their population from predatory tax practices. They must also join international efforts to close down havens that act as parasites on the global economy.”
As a result of massive tax evasion and avoidance via tax havens, states often attempt to recover lost taxation revenue through increasing regressive taxes that hurt the poor most - such as the Value Added Tax. Governments are placed under pressure to put in place incentives such as tax holidays and other incentives which do not serve a useful purpose. Manipulative accounting policies of multinational corporations, assisted by ac counting firms and banks, are at the heart of the matter. They channel corporate profits to secretive offshore tax havens in order to escape paying taxes in the countries that multinationals operate in.
“The aggressive tax avoidance policies of multinationals are amongst the darker sides of globalization. The problem is not limited to Zambia and Southern Africa. Over half of world trade is channelled through tax havens, despite the fact that these tax havens account for only 3% of the global GDP,” says Francis Weyzig, an expert from the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) based in the Netherlands. The problem is a worldwide epidemic that threatens the sovereignty of both developing and developed countries. US Senator Barack Obama has even sponsored a bill in the US: the Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act.
So why hasn’t the problem been addressed before?
Savior Mwambwa, of CSTNZ, explains: “The discussions around tax have traditionally taken place in closed circles, in esoteric language purposely designed to confuse the common person. We know there are also acute vested political interests of businesses and elites who would prefer the situation to continue as it does presently.”
The Civil Society Organisations Call upon :
National Government:
- To set up regulatory policies that monitor the transfer of funds
- To reconsider tax policies that place SMEs at a comparative disadvantage and stifle development
- To promote taxation policy that encourages sustainable business environments
- To demand country by country reporting by companies stating clearly what profits are made in each country where they operate
- To encourage a global standard in accounting?
- To call on the UN to adopt a global standard in taxation policy
- To negotiate Information exchange with tax havens
- To end retrogressive tax incentives such as EPZs
- To review mining contracts
- strengthen government institutions that limit corruption
Business:
- Respect the sovereign right of countries to setup national tax policy
- The incorporate of taxation policies into sustainability reporting
Civil Society Organizations should:
- WAKE UP TO TAX JUSTICE
- Act as a check on business and government with respect to taxation policy
- Target small to medium size business who are less able to take advantage of tax flight.
- Raise awareness among citizens about expanding the definition of corruption to include facilitators and tax havens that enable capital flight.
Matthew Clarke, a commentator on corporate responsibility working in South Africa, concludes: “Civil society is aware of the fact that business will argue that they are in fact the engine of development bringing jobs and important resources to communities. But predatory state taxation policies that encourage MNCs to set up shop without paying taxes place small to medium sized business at a financial disadvantage - stifling development.”
For more information contact:
Alvin Mosioma,
Tax Justice Network for Africa
Savior Mwambwa - National Coordinator
Civil Society Trade Network of Zambia- 0977-875404
Footnotes:
-What is capital flight- The deliberate and illicit disguise expatriation of money by those resident or taxable within the country of origin.
-What is VAT, Value Added Tax- A form of consumptive tax
-Creative accounting - Accounting practices designed to evade national taxation.
These are my links for May 9th:
Jérôme Turquey has a fascinating blog on a German television documentary where a reporter asked a number of banks if they would help move illicit funds in Liechtenstein to a Luxembourg bank. As he notes:
The adviser of the first bank praised the high standards of safety of the country which allowed anonymous placements with numbered accounts. This adviser even proposed the discrete transfer of the money from Liechtenstein to Luxembourg.
The adviser the second bank specified that the bank had great experience in the field and that there was nothing to fear coming from its head office.
The adviser of the third bank was more careful, informing the factitious clients of the risks on bleaching but presented the various means possible to place money without paying tax.
The adviser of the fourth bank refused to advise the customer
And who says banks don’t help tax evaders?
As Jérôme notes:
The documentary is perfect implementation of Lucien Thiel’s doctrine: that’s to say:
- It is not our duty to control if the tax payer was honest,
- Banking secrecy remains : Luxembourg is not compelled to communicate its client’s data.
That might be what Switzerland and Luxembourg say for now. I do not believe this will last.
Switzerland has announced that:
there has been a substantial increase in the amount of tax retained on behalf of the European Union for 2007. The withholding tax on savings accounts of EU citizens added up to SFr653 million ($618 million) last year, SFr116 million more than in 2006.
A little analysis shows this to be bluster, and that the real story is something quite different.
Let’s look at some facts. First, interest rates increased by at least 29.4% in the year i.e. from average daily 12-month Euro LIBOR of 3.44% in 2006 to 4.45% in 2007. Secondly, the € / CHF exchange rate improved by 3.1% from end 2006 to end 2007. All things being equal therefore, the Swiss withholding tax should have increased by at least 33% (1.294 x 1.031). However, the withholding tax increased by only 21.6%. That’s in real economic terms a fall, therefore. But this is illogical. We know, for example, that UBS had net private wealth inflows into Switzerland from 2000 until the last quarter - CHF31.5 billion in fact in the last quarter of 2007.
This also makes no sense. The implication of the sums withheld is that deposits subject to the EU STD have gone down, from €64.7 billion in 2007 to €58.9 billion in 2007.
The implication is obvious: EU STD avoidance is rising. It’s another very good reason for reform. TJN will keep campaigning for it.