{"id":93101,"date":"2026-06-16T07:03:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-16T06:03:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=93101"},"modified":"2026-06-16T07:03:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T06:03:18","slug":"debate-ammunition-the-uk-does-not-need-a-bailout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2026\/06\/16\/debate-ammunition-the-uk-does-not-need-a-bailout\/","title":{"rendered":"Debate Ammunition: The UK does not need a bailout"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Richard J Murphy YouTube Channel<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Debate Ammunition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The UK does not need a bailout<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Funding the Future | June 2026<\/span><\/p>\n

Today\u2019s topic<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The UK does not need a bailout.<\/p>\n

The video that this Debate Ammunition supports is available here.<\/a><\/p>\n

The Core Argument<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The Daily Telegraph\u2019s claim that the UK faces an IMF bailout because government debt is approaching \u00a33 trillion is deliberate scaremongering built on a fundamental misunderstanding of how sovereign money works.<\/p>\n

The UK borrows exclusively in sterling, a currency the government itself ultimately creates through the Bank of England, which means the UK cannot run out of pounds and cannot default.<\/p>\n

Far from being a threat to national solvency, government debt in the form of gilts is the bedrock of the entire UK financial system: without it, pension funds, life insurers, and the overnight banking market could not function.<\/p>\n

Key Statistics<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Statistic<\/span><\/th>\nFigure<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Projected UK government debt figure cited by The Telegraph<\/td>\n\u00a33 trillion (approximate)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Proportion of government deficit conventionally left in the economy each year<\/td>\nApproximately 3% of annual spending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Year in which the law requiring the Bank of England to honour a legal government spending instruction was enacted<\/td>\n1866<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Year of the IMF crisis incorrectly cited by The Telegraph as a precedent for current conditions<\/td>\n1976<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The Argument Structure<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Step 1 \u2014 The UK cannot run out of sterling:<\/span> The UK government borrows exclusively in its own currency. Because the Bank of England is the ultimate creator of sterling, and all banks that issue sterling are regulated by the Bank of England, the UK can always create the money needed to service or repay its debts. This is a technical fact, not a political preference.<\/p>\n

Step 2 \u2014 The 1970s comparison is false:<\/span> The 1976 IMF episode arose partly because the UK then held debts denominated in US dollars, inherited from the Second World War, and partly because of a lack of understanding in the aftermath of the final collapse of the gold standard. Those dollar-denominated liabilities no longer exist. The comparison The Telegraph draws is therefore historically illiterate as well as economically wrong.<\/p>\n

Step 3 \u2014 How government spending and taxation actually work:<\/span> Government spending is funded by the Bank of England creating money, not by collecting tax first. An analogy Richard uses is spending on a credit card or an overdraft: that spending creates money, the payment does not depend on prior saving. Taxation then reclaims money already spent in order to control inflation; it does not precede or finance the spending. Gilts exist to provide a safe deposit facility for large pools of private money, not to lend the government funds it does not have.<\/p>\n

Step 4 \u2014 Government debt is the foundation of the financial system:<\/span> Pension funds, life insurance companies, and banks all depend on gilts as secure, risk-free assets. The London overnight banking market uses government bonds as collateral. Reducing government debt, as The Telegraph demands, would remove those safe assets, force financial institutions into riskier private or foreign substitutes, and destabilise the very financial system the paper claims to be defending. The City of London has no interest in government debt being paid off.<\/p>\n

Their Argument \u2192 Your Rebuttal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
They Say<\/span><\/th>\nYour Response<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u00a33 trillion of debt is unsustainable and risks a sovereign debt crisis.<\/td>\nThe number is large, but it is denominated entirely in sterling, a currency the UK creates. A country that issues its own currency cannot face a sovereign debt crisis in that currency. The size of the number is irrelevant to solvency.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
This is like the 1970s. Labour government overspending led to an IMF bailout then, and it could happen again.<\/td>\nIn the 1970s the UK still held debts in US dollars, not sterling. That foreign-currency liability no longer exists. The comparison is historically false and The Telegraph knows it.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The government must live within its means. Tax revenues and borrowing constrain what it can spend.<\/td>\nThis reverses the actual sequence. Government spends first by creating money through the Bank of England; tax then reclaims that money to prevent inflation. There is a law dating from 1866 that requires the Bank of England to honour any legal spending instruction. Spending is not contingent on prior revenue.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
We should reduce government debt to make the public finances safer.<\/td>\nReducing government debt means removing gilts from financial markets. Pension funds, insurers, and banks rely on gilts as their safest assets. Without them, those institutions must hold riskier private or foreign debt. The financial system becomes more fragile, not less. The City of London would be the first to object.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The One-Liner<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe UK cannot run out of sterling, it cannot default on its debt, and the government bonds The Telegraph wants abolished are the very assets on which every pension fund, life insurer, and bank in this country depends.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Further Reading<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Post<\/span><\/th>\nDate<\/span><\/th>\nWhat it covers<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
The UK will not be going to the IMF for a bailout<\/a><\/td>\nJune 2026<\/td>\nDirect response to The Telegraph\u2019s IMF scaremongering; explains why sterling sovereignty makes a bailout technically impossible.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The UK government can never go bust<\/a><\/td>\nApril 2025<\/td>\nSets out the fundamental principle that a government issuing its own currency always has the capacity to create money to settle debts.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The national debt need never be paid off<\/a><\/td>\nMarch 2026<\/td>\nExplains why persistent government debt is structurally normal and not a burden requiring repayment; addresses the overseas interest-payment argument.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The bond market conspiracy<\/a><\/td>\nMay 2026<\/td>\nAddresses claims of bond market pressure on government; explains that pension funds and banks are required to hold gilts and the Bank of England can always intervene.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bonds<\/a><\/td>\nOctober 2025<\/td>\nExplains what government bonds are actually for: providing safe savings instruments for the financial sector, not funding government spending.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Why do governments issue bonds when they don\u2019t need to?<\/a><\/td>\nAugust 2024<\/td>\nDetailed account of how gilt issuance supports the City, pension markets, and overseas trade rather than financing government.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
There will never be a reason for the UK to ask the IMF for a bailout<\/a><\/td>\nAugust 2025<\/td>\nEarlier rebuttal of Telegraph-aligned economists claiming 1970s conditions are returning; demolishes the foreign-currency debt comparison.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hyperinflation? Not in the UK<\/a><\/td>\nJuly 2025<\/td>\nAddresses the companion scare story that government money creation inevitably leads to hyperinflation; explains why UK conditions are structurally different from historical cases.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Richard J Murphy YouTube Channel Debate Ammunition The UK does not need a bailout Funding the Future | June 2026 Today\u2019s topic The UK
Read the full article…<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[70,46,136,238,204,35,211,16,42,147,174,224,106,235,223],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-banking","category-bonds","category-city-of-london","category-debate-ammunition","category-economic-justice","category-economics","category-education","category-ethics","category-imf","category-inequality","category-modern-monetary-theory","category-neoliberalism","category-politics","category-politics-for-people","category-politics-of-care"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93101"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":93221,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93101\/revisions\/93221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}