{"id":83773,"date":"2025-07-07T06:50:40","date_gmt":"2025-07-07T05:50:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=83773"},"modified":"2025-07-07T07:35:49","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T06:35:49","slug":"are-starmer-and-reeves-now-going-to-make-children-with-special-needs-pay-to-balance-their-books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/07\/07\/are-starmer-and-reeves-now-going-to-make-children-with-special-needs-pay-to-balance-their-books\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Starmer and Reeves now going to make children with special needs pay to balance their books?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I very strongly support this letter signed by 100 very well-informed people<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/education\/2025\/jul\/06\/the-right-to-an-education-health-and-care-plan-must-be-retained\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> in the Guardian today<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The legal rights to an education that meets the needs of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) are under threat. Many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether.<\/p>\n<p>As new education reforms loom, every sign from the government suggests the right to an education, health and care plan (EHCP) is to be removed from children attending mainstream schools. Local authorities want EHCPs drastically reduced, or removed altogether, to relieve them of duties they often find costly and troublesome.<\/p>\n<p>About 85% of children with Send are educated in mainstream settings. Over 270,000 of these children have EHCPs. These legally enforceable documents detail a child or young person\u2019s needs, and the support to enable them to fulfil their individual potential. EHCPs allow children and young people with all kinds of disabilities to receive an education.<\/p>\n<p>Without statutory support, underpinned by necessary extra resources for schools, it\u2019s extremely unlikely that ministers will achieve their aim of more children with Send thriving, or even surviving, in mainstream education. A reduction or complete snatching-away of EHCPs in mainstream education wouldn\u2019t mean their needs magically vanish. It would, instead, increase applications for already overcrowded special schools or mean they would be forced out of school altogether.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">We believe the public are on our side, and we support the newly launched Save Our Children\u2019s Rights (SOCR) campaign led by Special Needs Jungle, IPSEA and others. This campaign is calling for EHCPs to be retained, now and in the future. SOCR\u2019s recent\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/711021\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">petition<\/a>\u00a0reflecting this aim rapidly passed 100,000 signatures, meaning the issue will be considered for a parliamentary debate, and is still growing.<\/p>\n<p>For more than 40 years, children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities have had a statutory right to an education that meets their needs. Set alongside catastrophic plans to cut benefits for disabled people, this raises the question of who we are as a country and the kind of society in which we want to live. Whatever the Send system\u2019s problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We know that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/04\/25\/the-far-right-autism-adhd-send-and-the-need-to-respect-and-celebrate-diversity\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reform and the Tories already deny<\/a> that there are as many children with autism and ADHD as clearly have these conditions, and that those children need the support that they clearly require, and we know that Labour is indifferent to the needs of those with almost any form of disability, could it be that Labour is now going to make children with special needs pay to balance their books? The possibility is real, and horrendous.<\/p>\n<p>I have already written about education and the economic benefits this morning. It would not just be economic madness to abandon children with Send, because the long-term costs of doing so will be horrendous; it would also represent massively inappropriate neoliberal economic madness. But has that ever stopped Starmer and Reeves?<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-83780\" src=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-07-at-07.26.08-550x749.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"550\" height=\"749\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-07-at-07.26.08-550x749.png 550w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-07-at-07.26.08-220x300.png 220w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-07-at-07.26.08-294x400.png 294w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Screenshot-2025-07-07-at-07.26.08.png 604w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><b>Taking further action<\/b><\/p>\n<p>If you want to write a letter to your MP on the issues raised in this blog post, there is a ChatGPT prompt to assist you in doing so, with full instructions,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/06\/20\/chatgpt-prompt-for-a-letter-to-your-mp\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I very strongly support this letter signed by 100 very well-informed people in the Guardian today: The legal rights to an education that meets the<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/07\/07\/are-starmer-and-reeves-now-going-to-make-children-with-special-needs-pay-to-balance-their-books\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[215,204,35,211,147,118,106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-age-of-aggression","category-economic-justice","category-economics","category-education","category-inequality","category-labour","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83773"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83783,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83773\/revisions\/83783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}