{"id":83494,"date":"2025-06-27T06:41:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-27T05:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=83494"},"modified":"2025-06-27T06:41:32","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T05:41:32","slug":"do-not-be-young-do-not-be-ill-do-not-be-old-labour-is-intent-on-failing-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/06\/27\/do-not-be-young-do-not-be-ill-do-not-be-old-labour-is-intent-on-failing-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Do not be young. Do not be ill. Do not be old. Labour is intent on failing you."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/politics\/2025\/06\/26\/keir-starmer-caves-in-to-rebels-on-benefits\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Telegraph<\/a> reported last night:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Sir Keir Starmer has caved to welfare rebels by agreeing that existing disability claimants can keep their benefits.<\/p>\n<p>In a major concession, The Telegraph understands that the Prime Minister has agreed that nobody currently getting the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will lose out.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, changes to who is eligible for the money, which is given to help people with\u00a0the extra cost of disabilities, will only apply to new claimants.<\/p>\n<p>The change\u00a0<a class=\"ck-custom-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/business\/2025\/06\/26\/british-chamber-of-commerce-starmer-ftse-100-markets\/\">will cost the Treasury around \u00a31.5 billion a year<\/a>\u00a0by the end of the decade, slashing the original savings from the welfare cuts plan by a third.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let's be clear about what this means.<\/p>\n<p>It means every young person coming of age who is in need of support will not get it in future.<\/p>\n<p>It means people developing chronic or degenerative illnesses in the future will find it much harder to get support.<\/p>\n<p>It means those barely coping now, but who know they will get worse with age (and that is commonplace) will not get the help they require.<\/p>\n<p>As Neil Kinnock said in the 1983 general election campaign, of the Tories:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I warn you not to be ordinary.<\/p>\n<p>I warn you not to be young.<\/p>\n<p>I warn you not to fall ill.<\/p>\n<p>I warn you not to get old.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He should now say it of Labour. Those are the situations that create the risks we now face, imposed by this Labour government.<\/p>\n<p>He should be ashamed to be still in that party.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<p><b>Taking further action<\/b><\/p>\n<p>If you want to write a letter to your MP on the issues raised in this blog post, there is a ChatGPT prompt to assist you in doing so, with full instructions, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/06\/20\/chatgpt-prompt-for-a-letter-to-your-mp\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As The Telegraph reported last night: Sir Keir Starmer has caved to welfare rebels by agreeing that existing disability claimants can keep their benefits. In<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/06\/27\/do-not-be-young-do-not-be-ill-do-not-be-old-labour-is-intent-on-failing-you\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[215,14,204,35,16,147,118,106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-age-of-aggression","category-corruption","category-economic-justice","category-economics","category-ethics","category-inequality","category-labour","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83494"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83496,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83494\/revisions\/83496"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}