{"id":81382,"date":"2025-04-05T07:08:41","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T06:08:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=81382"},"modified":"2025-04-05T07:08:41","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T06:08:41","slug":"is-it-time-for-the-bancor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/04\/05\/is-it-time-for-the-bancor\/","title":{"rendered":"Is it time for the Bancor?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 1944, Lord Keynes proposed that the post-war settlement should include the creation of a new currency to be used solely for international settlement purposes.<\/p>\n<p>The aim was to prevent any country from enjoying the privilege of issuing the world's reserve currency, as the UK had done and as the USA was by then doing.<\/p>\n<p>This new currency he called the Bancor. Not having time to summarise the proposal this morning (I have a long day out ahead of me), I asked ChatGPT to undertake the task, and it offered this, which seems like a fair summary to me:<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Lord John Maynard Keynes proposed the idea of an international reserve currency called <span class=\"s1\"><b>Bancor<\/b><\/span> during the negotiations that led to the <span class=\"s1\"><b>Bretton Woods Conference<\/b><\/span> in 1944. His proposal aimed to address global trade imbalances and promote a more stable and equitable international monetary system.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Here are the key features of Keynes\u2019 Bancor proposal:<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f539; 1. <\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<h3><em><b>Creation of a Supranational Currency \u2013 Bancor<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em><span class=\"s1\"><b>Bancor<\/b><\/span> would be a unit of account used for international trade and settlement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>It would not be issued by any single country but by a <span class=\"s1\"><b>global central clearing union<\/b><\/span>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Bancor would not be used domestically but only for international transactions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f539; 2. <\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<h3><em><b>International Clearing Union (ICU)<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>A new global institution, the <span class=\"s1\"><b>International Clearing Union<\/b><\/span>, would manage Bancor issuance and settlement of international balances.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>All trade would be settled in Bancors, rather than gold or national currencies like the dollar or pound.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f539; 3. <\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<h3><em><b>Balanced Trade Mechanism<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Keynes wanted both <span class=\"s1\"><b>surplus<\/b><\/span> and <span class=\"s1\"><b>deficit<\/b><\/span> countries to bear responsibility for correcting trade imbalances.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>The ICU would impose <span class=\"s1\"><b>penalties<\/b><\/span> on both:<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Countries with persistent <span class=\"s1\"><b>deficits<\/b><\/span> (who draw too much Bancor)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Countries with persistent <span class=\"s1\"><b>surpluses<\/b><\/span> (who hoard Bancor and restrict global liquidity)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>This was revolutionary: surplus countries, like the U.S. at the time, would also be pressured to adjust.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f539; 4. <\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<h3><em><b>Exchange Rate Stability<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>National currencies would be tied to Bancor but adjustable with permission from the ICU.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>This would allow for some flexibility, unlike the rigid gold standard.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f539; 5. <\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<h3><em><b>Credit Lines and Overdraft Facilities<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Countries could have <span class=\"s1\"><b>overdraft limits<\/b><\/span> with the ICU, giving them temporary liquidity without immediately depleting reserves.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>This would help smooth out short-term trade deficits and avoid painful domestic adjustments.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x2733;&#xfe0f; Why It Didn\u2019t Happen<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>The U.S. opposed the Bancor idea, preferring a system based on the <span class=\"s1\"><b>U.S. dollar<\/b><\/span> as the primary reserve currency.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>The <span class=\"s1\"><b>Bretton Woods system<\/b><\/span> ultimately used the dollar (convertible to gold) as the anchor instead of Bancor.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><em><b>&#x1f4cc; Legacy and Relevance<\/b><\/em><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>The Bancor idea has inspired later proposals, such as the <span class=\"s1\"><b>IMF\u2019s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)<\/b><\/span>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em>Some economists and policymakers revisit it when debating global financial reform, especially during crises that highlight the flaws of a dollar-centric system.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Is that what the world now needs? I suggest it is.<\/p>\n<p>Would that have also, perversely, have solved the problem that Trump thinks the US now suffers from of having massive trade imbalances? Yes, it would.<\/p>\n<p>Who opposed it? The US did.<\/p>\n<p>How to create it? I think that might be easy: the world should swap its dollars for bancors, providing the new currency with reserve balances as a result.<\/p>\n<p>This might be a theme to return to.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 1944, Lord Keynes proposed that the post-war settlement should include the creation of a new currency to be used solely for international settlement purposes.<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2025\/04\/05\/is-it-time-for-the-bancor\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[215,35,106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-age-of-aggression","category-economics","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81382"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":81383,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81382\/revisions\/81383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}