{"id":70333,"date":"2023-06-13T07:51:53","date_gmt":"2023-06-13T06:51:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=70333"},"modified":"2023-06-13T08:40:35","modified_gmt":"2023-06-13T07:40:35","slug":"hope-to-fund-labours-28-billion-spending-plan-and-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2023\/06\/13\/hope-to-fund-labours-28-billion-spending-plan-and-more\/","title":{"rendered":"How to fund Labour\u2019s \u00a328 billion spending plan, and more"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>My Green New Deal Group and Finance for the Future colleague, Colin Hines, has this letter in the Guardian this morning:<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"dcr-94xsh\">Your <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/commentisfree\/2023\/jun\/09\/the-guardian-view-on-broken-britain-it-wont-be-fixed-with-the-status-quo\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">editorial<\/a> (9 June) is correct to call Rachel Reeves\u2019 retreat from her \u00a328bn annual commitment on green investment an example of the renewal of a failed economic consensus. This has seen Labour aping Jeremy Hunt\u2019s ludicrous emphasis on reducing the national debt. Instead, Labour must become leader of a pack of opposition parties all demanding a massive increase in expenditure on social and green infrastructure, and on the wages and conditions of those working in these areas. One recent <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theneweuropean.co.uk\/britains-220bn-black-hole\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">estimate suggests<\/a>that to achieve this, the next government will need to invest \u00a3220bn per year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-94xsh\">All opposition parties should promise the next parliament will use its powers to provide the money needed to fix broken Britain. This can come from three sources. First, the estimated <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2023\/01\/13\/the-wealthiest-10-in-the-uk-get-at-least-30bn-a-year-in-subsidies-for-their-savings-each-year-enough-to-pay-for-the-nhs-for-9-weeks\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">\u00a355bn a year<\/a> of tax breaks for pension savers must be redesigned to support employment-creating investment with social and environmental goals, as should some of the <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/collections\/individual-savings-accounts-isa-statistics\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">\u00a370bn a year<\/a> saved tax-free in Isas \u2013 a much-needed exercise in intergenerational solidarity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-94xsh\">Second, increased revenue from a fairer taxation system, where the wealthier contribute far more. Finally, as a backstop for any funding shortfalls, quantitative easing should be restarted. What <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/labour\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">Labour<\/a> and indeed all the opposition parties have got to grasp is that you can\u2019t have the necessary equivalent of Roosevelt\u2019s New Deal without a massive increase in new debt. The \u00a328bn is a mere down payment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-94xsh\"><strong>Colin Hines<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Conven<\/em><em>er, UK Green New Deal Group<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My Green New Deal Group and Finance for the Future colleague, Colin Hines, has this letter in the Guardian this morning: Your editorial (9 June)<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2023\/06\/13\/hope-to-fund-labours-28-billion-spending-plan-and-more\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,108,74,118,106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-environment","category-green-new-deal","category-labour","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70333"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70333\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70338,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70333\/revisions\/70338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}