{"id":67377,"date":"2023-02-06T08:49:32","date_gmt":"2023-02-06T08:49:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=67377"},"modified":"2023-02-06T08:49:32","modified_gmt":"2023-02-06T08:49:32","slug":"time-to-update-the-blog-design","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2023\/02\/06\/time-to-update-the-blog-design\/","title":{"rendered":"Time to update the blog design?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Two ideas came in last week as a result of the discussion on the glossary.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
One was from regular commentator<\/a> Ian Tresman. His suggestion is that the glossary should be a wiki and not a PDF download. I do actually already have a wiki<\/a> - although it has had little use because no one seemed to follow links to it when I used it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
However, what do people think?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Or, would it simply be better if the glossary was a separate page on the blog with each definition linked to that rather than being in the rather less familiar wiki format?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
And talking of the blog, the other comment<\/a> came from another commentator also, coincidentally, called Ian. He pointed out three things:<\/div>\n
\n
    \n
  1. The blog is hard to search.<\/li>\n
  2. It looks a bit archaic (my interpretation of his words: I can be rude about it and he was not)<\/li>\n
  3. Both could be improved to advantage.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
    My guess is the search function could be improved but there are real issues that mean it may never work that well:<\/div>\n