{"id":47242,"date":"2019-12-16T09:06:40","date_gmt":"2019-12-16T09:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=47242"},"modified":"2019-12-16T09:06:40","modified_gmt":"2019-12-16T09:06:40","slug":"the-green-new-deal-big-enough-to-make-a-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2019\/12\/16\/the-green-new-deal-big-enough-to-make-a-difference\/","title":{"rendered":"The Green New Deal: big enough to make a difference"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ben Wray is a freelance journalist based in O\u00c3\u00b1ati, and produces a morning newsletter called Common A.M., which you can sign up to at CommonSpace.Scot\/Newsletter<\/a>. I thought this review by him of the Green New Deal worth sharing. It was originally on a website called Enough<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

I\u2019ve spent a few weeks analysing Green New Deal politics across the western world, reading the latest literature and looking at what is working and what isn\u2019t. I\u2019ve also been researching effective social movements of the past that have changed the course of history, trying to understand what are the common themes of all of them which made them powerful. Finally, I\u2019ve been looking at the General Election manifestos of the main political parties in the UK, to get an idea of what they are proposing.<\/p>\n

In this piece I am going to summarise my findings, briefly presenting what\u2019s going on with the GND movement, then proposing 10 key do\u2019s and don\u2019t for the movement if it is to progress.<\/p>\n

If you feel you have a good working knowledge of Green New Deal politics, you may wish to skip to the section \u201910 things the Green New Deal movement should do \u2014 and 10 things it shouldn\u2019t\u2019.<\/p>\n

The Green New Deal has lift off<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s remarkable to think that just over one year ago the Green New Deal was a fringe idea that almost no one in the mainstream of politics had heard of, never mind taken seriously. The sea change (no pun intended) since then \u2014 where now it is on the lips of leaders across the world \u2014 has been driven by a number of factors coming together at once.<\/p>\n

The idea took off in the space of a week, which started with the pivotal IPCC report coming out last November on the need to keep warming to 1.5C, and ended with Alexandia Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) speaking ay the Sunrise movement\u2019s occupation of Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi\u2019s office to make the case for a Green New Deal.<\/p>\n

Since then, the idea has taken off like a rocket, spreading across the Atlantic and becoming a staple of climate politics in the western world. The Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion movements have used protest and direct action to give the ideas energy and keep the issue in the news.<\/p>\n

From a vague idea towards a concrete goal<\/strong><\/p>\n

Part of the reason for the Green New Deal\u2019s rapid ascendancy was that people knew it meant something big and ambitious, but little more than that. This vagueness was a strength to begin with as a broad coalition of people have been able to project their own approach on to a common idea for climate action. However, if the movement is to continue to progress there is a need to rapidly move to a new phase, where GND promotion and inspiration gives way to concrete plans and demands for implementation.<\/p>\n

If this doesn\u2019t happen, the danger is that the phrase becomes an empty vessel devoid of real meaning. Already we\u2019ve seen some leaders and governments disingenuously attach themselves to the slogan, despite their actual policies not matching up to the ambitions of the Green New Deal movement.<\/p>\n

A growing body of literature advocating the Green New Deal is clarifying what the term really means, and what it doesn\u2019t. Recent books by\u00a0Naomi Klein<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Ann Pettifor<\/a>\u00a0are good examples of an increased intellectual concreteness which is now steering the idea. Think-tank\u2019s like\u00a0the New Economics Foundation<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Common Weal<\/a>\u00a0are adding policy meat to the Green New Deal skeleton.<\/p>\n

A few common elements can be deciphered from this:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The Green New Deal is about total economic transformation \u2014\u00a0<\/strong>not simply changing the energy sector, and not simply greening the system; it is an idea for sustainability and equality for the entire economy.<\/li>\n
  2. The Green New Deal is about a new economic model \u2014\u00a0<\/strong>The model of capitalist development based on what Marx called \u201caccumulation for accumulation\u2019s sake\u201d \u2014 the pursuit of profit as the bottom line \u2014 on a planet with finite resources is doomed to crisis and collapse. The financial system which has built up around the needs of serving capital accumulation with infinite credit, and the role of the neoliberal state as the protectorate of that financial system, are therefore also incongruous with a sustainable economic system. Green New Deal economics is heterogenous in that there are a number of different approaches, but the common denominator of all of them is a break with the current paradigm of growth and capital accumulation as the bottom line.<\/li>\n
  3. The Green New Deal is about acting where you are, and acting now \u2014<\/strong>\u00a0As the FT\u00a0succinctly put it<\/a>\u00a0when describing the ethos behind the Green New Deal: \u201cThe goal is to make decarbonisation a defining national mission rather than an internationally mandated chore.\u201d GND politics is about collective action for the collective good, especially on the big priority areas like heating and transport. It is not about targets, it is not about plans in the distant future, and it is definitely not about UN summits for the self-aggrandisement of global leaders.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Green New Deal whirlwind tour<\/strong><\/p>\n

    To get an idea of where Green New Deal politics is at in different places, here is a quick summary of what\u2019s going on in the US, UK and mainland Europe.<\/p>\n

    United States:<\/strong>\u00a0The Green New Deal has become a key part of the Democratic Primary race. It is especially associated with the left of the Democrats, with Bernie Sanders making it central to his election campaign, but it\u2019s a sign of the pressure on the Establishment-wing of the party that Joe Biden, current frontrunner, has also\u00a0formally backed the idea<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    It is also being pursued legislatively, with a resolution put forward by AOC and Ed Markey to the Congress in February. But it\u2019s here that the differences are posed most starkly, with Pelosi welcoming \u201cthe enthusiasm\u201d of AOC and Markey\u2019s proposals, but stating: \u201c\u201cI can\u2019t say we\u2019re going to take that and pass it.\u201d Whereas AOC\u2019s plan proposes a 2030 transition to zero-carbon which also includes social measures such as free housing, medical coverage and higher education, Pelosi\u2019s Bill limits itself to trying to get the US to re-commit to the Paris Agreement.<\/p>\n

    The Democratic Primary will be key to what happens next with the Green New Deal in the US, where the idea has helped re-invigorate socialist politics in in the Democrats, providing it with a new sense of mission and urgency. With Barack Obama\u00a0warning that the party<\/a>\u00a0is moving \u201ctoo far left\u201d, the\u00a0trillion-dollar spending<\/a>\u00a0associated with the US Green New Deal is the sort of issue that he and other establishment Democrats will be seeking to keep out of the presidential race with the climate-denying Donald Trump \u2014 who has said the Green New Deal would\u00a0\u201ckill millions of jobs\u201d<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 at the end of 2020.<\/p>\n

    UK:<\/strong>\u00a0The Green New Deal is now advocated by all parties on the left to differing degrees.<\/p>\n

    The Labour Party has made a \u2018green industrial revolution\u2019 central to their\u00a0election manifesto<\/a>, and are promising a \u00a3250 billion \u2018Green Transformation Fund\u2019 to finance it, as well as a \u2018Just Transition Tax\u2019 on the oil & gas corporations which have contributed most to the UK\u2019s historic carbon emissions, with the money principally being used to fund new jobs for oil & gas workers in the north-east of Scotland. Labour\u2019s plan to nationalise the energy sector could also lay the foundations for a GND.<\/p>\n

    The SNP backs a GND and is establishing a Scottish National Investment Bank which it says will have as its principal mission financing the zero-carbon transition. However, the commitment\u2019s in the party\u2019s\u00a0election manifesto<\/a>\u00a0do not amount to a Green New Deal in practise, as it prioritises market-based solutions and private sector subsidies. Nicola Sturgeon has\u00a0also opposed<\/a>\u00a0Labour\u2019s Just Transition Tax, saying she believed it would lead to lost jobs in the oil & gas sector.<\/p>\n

    The Conservatives talk about a \u201cGreen Industrial Revolution\u201d in\u00a0their manifesto<\/a>\u00a0and say they will spend more on infrastructure but the biggest spending commitments are on fixing pot-holes in the roads, and under their fiscal rules will not borrow to invest more than 3 per cent of GDP per year, which means they can\u2019t get close to the investment needed for a Green New Deal.<\/p>\n

    The fossil fuel sector still receives bigger subsidies than renewables in Britain, and, as the absence of the Tories from\u00a0the climate debate<\/a>\u00a0on Channel 4 highlighted, this election is set to be a decisive one for the future of the Green New Deal in Britain.<\/p>\n

    EU:<\/strong>\u00a0The European Union as a whole is well behind meeting the terms of the Paris Agreement, with leading states like Germany still\u00a0locked into coal production<\/a>\u00a0until 2038. On Thursday the European Parliament\u00a0backed a Climate Emergency<\/a>\u00a0and set a new target of 55 per cent emissions cut by 2030; still well short of what is required.<\/p>\n

    The Green New Deal has started to pick up momentum as it has become clear that the EU\u2019s market based mechanisms, like the Emissions Trading Scheme, are\u00a0woefully inadequate<\/a>. The GND is posited as an alternative to the current ultra-low public investment environment in the Eurozone, with the currency union\u2019s perverse fiscal rules acting to suppress employment in the Southern European economies in particular.<\/p>\n

    But while the GND is increasingly talked up across the European left, the mechanism by which it is brought about is divided between pan-European solutions, advocated for instance by\u00a0Yanis Varoufakis\u2019 DIEM25<\/a>, and a return to the nation-state, with\u00a0Jean-Luc M\u00c3\u00a9lenchon<\/a>\u00a0among the leading proponents of a radical reform of the Eurozone, and failing that a \u2018Plan B\u2019 of unilateral exit.\u00a0 The European Commission is set to unveil a \u2018European Green Deal\u2019 plan on 11 December, but an\u00a0early leaked draft<\/a>\u00a0suggests a lack of hard numbers is a concern as to how solid it is, though a commitment to review \u201cthe state aid guidelines for environment and energy\u201d is more promising.<\/p>\n

    The case of the Yellow Vests movement in France shows where green politics can go wrong if it is devoid of a radical agenda and instead seeks to pin the costs on those whose standard of living is already being squeezed. Macron scrapped a wealth tax and replaced it with a tax on fuel to fund green investment. That policy did not last the protests against it and much more, which still rumble on to this day, but in the critique of Emmanuel Macron\u2019s greenwashing and the challenge to inequality, there are\u00a0commonalities which can be found<\/a>\u00a0between the Yellow Vests and GND advocates.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

    10 things the Green New Deal movement should do \u2014 and 10 things it shouldn\u2019t<\/strong><\/p>\n

    How do we go forward from here? While every place has its own political conditions to consider, drawing from international experience there are a number of definite do\u2019s and do not\u2019s that activists should consider.<\/p>\n

    1) Demand performance \u2014 not targets<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Talk is cheap, and letting politicians talk about climate targets is letting them off the hook. It\u2019s the easiest thing in the world for a leader to talk about an ambitious target in ten or 20 years time as they don\u2019t have to take the tough decision to deliver it. We need to be clear that ambitious targets does not make any nation a \u2018world leader\u2019 \u2014 only ambitious actions in the here and now can do that.<\/p>\n

    The Green New Deal movement should not waste one more second talking about targets; we should demand detailed plans for implementation, and exacting timescales to go with those plans. And the start date on the plans must be now.<\/p>\n

    2)\u00a0Be collectivist \u2014 not individualist<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Bernie Sanders slogan\u00a0\u2018not me, us\u2019<\/a>\u00a0should be the slogan of the Green New Deal movement worldwide. We need to imbue political culture with a new collective spirit and sense of common purpose, and the Green New Deal is the perfect idea with which to do that.<\/p>\n

    There should be no truck with those who would seek to force the movement down the alienating, doomed-to-fail route of individual consumer choices. Not only is that a terrible approach to addressing a collective problem, it\u2019s also morally dubious. We have government to establish a collective set of laws which govern the limits of our individual actions; that\u2019s what it exists for. There\u2019s absolutely no reason why we should all accept the need for laws when it comes to, for instance, food standards and workplace health & safety, but not for ecological sustainability.<\/p>\n

    3)\u00a0Be positive \u2014 not miserable<\/strong><\/p>\n

    I write this is as someone prone to apocalyptic doom-mongering \u2014 it\u2019s not helpful, it\u2019s not appealing and it\u2019s not effective. Everywhere that the Green New Deal is taking off as an idea it is because it is being led by people with a positive story to tell about how not only can we save the world, but we can make all of our lives better in the process.<\/p>\n

    That\u2019s why while there is a need to reduce global economic output, it is better to couch that in the language of \u2018better\u2019, rather than \u2018smaller\u2019. And that\u2019s not misleading either \u2014 while we need less cars, we also need healthier cities that are more enjoyable to live in. Both things are true, it\u2019s a question of which one you choose to emphasise.<\/p>\n

    4) Be unilateralist \u2014 not multilateralist<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Paris Agreement should have taught us that even if agreements are reached at a global level, unless they can be enforced at national level they are meaningless.<\/p>\n

    There\u2019s a whole circuit of well-intentioned NGO\u2019s, academics and journalists who are waiting for the next UN Climate Summit, thinking this will finally be the one to get climate action moving. And national leaders love the international summits because it makes them feel like super-heroes. But they are not, and the summits rarely lead to anything serious on the ground for a reason \u2014 they don\u2019t actually exercise a lot of power. Multilateralism on climate action is a bit like multilateralism on nuclear weapons abolition\u00a0 \u2014 useless.<\/p>\n

    No more waiting. If international institutions push forward then great, but the action of the Green New Deal movement needs to be locally and nationally focused. Think global, act local \u2014 and national.<\/p>\n

    5) Be socialist \u2014 not capitalist<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Capitalist enterprises and the markets they operate in are structurally incapable of delivering the Green New Deal. They simply are not set-up for the sort of long-term, large-scale, cross-sector action that is needed to decarbonise the economy. Just as the moon-landing and Britain\u2019s war economy in fighting the Nazis could have only been done on the basis of massive, co-ordinated state planning, so it is for the Green New Deal.<\/p>\n

    To put it in a more practical way, think about this. In the UK we have the highest proportion of non-renewable heating in Europe; more than 90 per cent of heating is through natural gas. Heating along with transport is where most emissions are now coming from. In the space of a decade the UK needs to replace tens of millions of gas boilers with zero-carbon options. House-by-house solutions like air source heat pumps simply can not be efficiently done at that scale, speed and with adequate reliability. The only way to do this is enormously expensive, requires a mammoth co-ordination of resources and labour to the task, and means carrying out infrastructure instalments largely on a district, rather than house-by-house, basis. Capitalist markets can\u2019t solve our heating emissions problem in a decade. Only socialism can. Full stop.<\/p>\n

    6) Be concrete \u2014 not abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Green New Deal movement has to start being precise with its demands. Politicians like to get away with abstract sloganeering if they are allowed to, but we need to force them to be exacting. Take the district heating example cited above \u2014 we do not currently have the skilled workforce to carry out this scale of infrastructure change in the timescale required. So what is our government doing to train more plumbers and electricians? How is it co-ordinating them? Is it sourcing the piping material? How many houses is it going to do per year?<\/p>\n

    The challenge with concreteness is getting round the short-termism of politics, which operates to an electoral cycle and is motivated not by getting things done but by capturing headlines. The trick is to generate headlines\u00a0around<\/em>\u00a0concrete demands.<\/p>\n

    7) Break the rules \u2014 don\u2019t bend to the rules<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The current set of rules for how economies are governed is not fit for purpose in an era of multiple ecological crisis. As a\u00a0UN report<\/a>\u00a0by a group of Finnish academics put it, the \u201cdominant economic theories, approaches, and models\u2026were developed during the era of energetic and material abundance\u201d.<\/p>\n

    In that context, it is irresponsible to limit the horizons of a Green New Deal to that which is within the constraints of national and international rules which act to thwart effective climate action. The EU\u2019s rules on state aid, fiscal limits and \u2018free\u2019 movement of capital and goods, for instance, are a barrier to a Green New Deal. Regardless of whether states are in or outside the EU, these rules must be broken if rapid progress is to be made. Equally, Scottish political leaders should not restrict themselves only to areas of devolved competence. Climate action should be directed by need, not rules \u2014 let London and Brussels try to stop us, rather than using their rules as an excuse for our inaction.<\/p>\n

    8) Be universal \u2014 not sectional<\/strong><\/p>\n

    All the great movements of history have had a universal message and have not been afraid to think big, and in so doing seizing the terrain of \u2018freedom\u2019 and \u2018justice\u2019 and making it their own. The Civil Rights movement and\u00a0Martin Luther King<\/a>\u00a0are good examples of this. King fought for the rights of an oppressed minority, but he did so by speaking to universal values and interests, and envisioning a new world which all would benefit from.<\/p>\n

    In Nelson Mandela\u2019s famous \u2018I am prepared to die\u2019 speech, which was in substance a 3-hour long case for the sabotage of the property of the white supremacists, he appealed to a global, universal audience, when he argued: \u201cI have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all people will live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal for which I hope to live for and to see realised.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The Green New Deal must not be pigeon-holed as a movement only of the young, or only of the cosmopolitan. Part of the point of a movement is to overcome narrow, sectional interests and partisan political divides, and instead make a claim to speak for society as a whole.<\/p>\n

    9) Reach outside the bubble<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Green New Deal movement cannot be a Twitter phenomenon. Neither can it comfort itself with speaking to rooms full of the converted. It needs to get offline, and get out of university cities. The Green New Deal movement can have a message that speaks to people concerned about run-down town centres, about crap jobs, about a lack of decent public transport, but not if it is talking to itself.<\/p>\n

    Again, Bernie Sanders provides a decent template here. His presidential campaign has explicitly sought to reach outside the bubble. This video of Sanders getting a big cheer at a Fox News organised town hall debate is a good example of bridging divides and knocking down barriers.<\/p>\n