{"id":4342,"date":"2009-07-28T10:40:12","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T08:40:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/07\/28\/jersey-i-hate-to-say-it-but-i-told-you-so\/"},"modified":"2009-07-28T17:36:53","modified_gmt":"2009-07-28T15:36:53","slug":"jersey-i-hate-to-say-it-but-i-told-you-so","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/07\/28\/jersey-i-hate-to-say-it-but-i-told-you-so\/","title":{"rendered":"Jersey \u00e2\u20ac\u201c I hate to say it, but I told you so"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sorry to brag \u2014 but I&rsquo;ve just read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gov.je\/NR\/rdonlyres\/19EA3036-0629-40EB-9794-75C8183CF0D4\/0\/CompleteDraftBusinessPlan.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Jersey Business Plan for 2010<\/a>. And this is where it now forecasts its finance will be over the next few years:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Documents\/jersey2010.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Back in 2007 when Jersey published its business plan for 2008 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2007\/11\/26\/jerseys-black-hole\/\" target=\"_blank\">I said its predictions  were ludicrous<\/a>. They claimed the following at that time:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Documents\/JerseyBudget.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is pretty much the red line noted above.<\/p>\n<p>I said the following was much more likely (the second column headed 2008 should read 2009 \u2014 apologies):<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Documents\/JerseyTaxTrends4.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So, OK, I forecast the decline would be faster than it has actually been. But I note I was a lot closer, a lot sooner, to the true likely long term picture than the States of Jersey were.<\/p>\n<p>Respectfully, their forecasts never did make sense \u2014 and I remain quite convinced they will be at the bottom range of their current forecast.<\/p>\n<p>Tow final thoughts: first they can find only \u00a36 million of cuts in response to this \u2014 about 1% of spending. And apparently this includes such things as cutting baby milk in their maternity unit! I think this a significant indicator of what will happen in the UK \u2014 talk of 15% cuts is ludicrous \u2014 they just aren&rsquo;t there to be had. Second, they are saying the obvious response is new taxes and charges. Sorry to brag again, but I told them that in face to face discussion with Senator Le Sueur \u2014 their first minister \u2014 way back in 2005.<\/p>\n<p>They didn&rsquo;t listen then. I don&rsquo;t suppose they will now. But it might have paid them to do so. they&rsquo;d be a lot better off if they had.<\/p>\n<p>As it is, I confidently predict that my other prediction - that Jersey is heading to go bust - remains likely.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sorry to brag \u2014 but I&rsquo;ve just read the Jersey Business Plan for 2010. And this is where it now forecasts its finance will be<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/07\/28\/jersey-i-hate-to-say-it-but-i-told-you-so\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4342"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4342\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}