{"id":3531,"date":"2009-04-02T13:41:30","date_gmt":"2009-04-02T11:41:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/04\/02\/update-from-stephen-timms\/"},"modified":"2009-04-02T13:41:30","modified_gmt":"2009-04-02T11:41:30","slug":"update-from-stephen-timms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/04\/02\/update-from-stephen-timms\/","title":{"rendered":"Update from Stephen Timms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The briefing from Stephen Timms was positive. He clearly expects a result on tax havens.<\/p>\n<p>He said there was \u00e2\u20ac\u0161\u00c3\u201e\u00c3\u00b2lively discussion&rsquo; \u2014 for which read disagreement.<\/p>\n<p>He said \u00e2\u20ac\u0161\u00c3\u201e\u00c3\u00b2the era of banking secrecy is over&rsquo; and \u00e2\u20ac\u0161\u00c3\u201e\u00c3\u00b2tax information does need to be exchanged.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p>He was emphatic \u2014 commitments are not enough to avoid blacklisting \u2014 and blacklisting will happen, but probably not today. It will actually be a black, shades of grey and white list as I understand it.<\/p>\n<p>He says the Summit will address the need for commitment.<\/p>\n<p>He also, very refreshingly, made clear it is government view that the opacity of tax havens did directly contribute to the crash in confidence between banks that precipitated the current crisis.<\/p>\n<p>He finished with &ldquo;I am expecting sanctions and in due course a listing.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>As I suggested this morning.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The briefing from Stephen Timms was positive. He clearly expects a result on tax havens. He said there was \u00e2\u20ac\u0161\u00c3\u201e\u00c3\u00b2lively discussion&rsquo; \u2014 for which read<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2009\/04\/02\/update-from-stephen-timms\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,80,32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-g20","category-secrecy-jurisdictions","category-tax-havens"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3531\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}