The leaked G20 communiqu?\u00a9 has this to say on tax havens:<\/p>\n
\n[T]o take action to identify non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens, and to stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. We have today published a list of jurisdictions that have not committed to the international standard for exchange of information on tax. We call on the Global Forum, the FATF, and the [Financial Stability Board] to identify, for the next meeting of our Finance Ministers, jurisdictions not implementing the relevant international standards.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
My sources tell me that is not the final wording.<\/p>\n
I’m not now expecting a list. I am expecting a commitment to publish a list in six months. I am expecting mention of sanctions. I am expecting a lot of noise around the announcement as to what it means and what might be expected over the next six months.<\/p>\n
What does this mean? This, I suggest:<\/p>\n
\n
- The anti-tax haven initiative is rolling again;<\/li>\n
- The lesson of publishing a hasty, wrong or too political list has been learned and care is being taken;<\/li>\n
- This time the list will be more than a list \u2014 it has action attached to it;<\/li>\n
- The opportunity for input and discussion now exists;<\/li>\n
- Those who want to reform have some opportunity to do so.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
That’s all appropriate. Dumping a \u00e2\u20ac\u0161\u00c3\u201e\u00c3\u00b2guilty’ sign on places tomorrow might not help. The creation of more time pressure does help. I can live with it.<\/p>\n
I can live with the noises that I’m getting that developing countries are to be provided with access to the process \u2014 if it happens.- OECD take note.<\/p>\n
I can live with demands for multilateralism \u2014 OECD take note. I gather they are being heard.<\/p>\n
I accept there is much work to do with countries like China \u2014 who has problems with Hong Kong being on any list. I am furious with Germany who for quite bizarre reasons is widely reported to be blocking Austria and Luxembourg from being listed. If true, they need a kick.<\/p>\n
But let’s not miss the point. As I’ve said often \u2014 this is the opening of a long process. I have not got a commitment to automatic information exchange. I have not got country by country reporting. I have not got a commitment to data on public record. I agree I wanted these \u2014 and those were the demands of Put People Fist \u2014 I know because I presented them to ministers- But anyone who has ever negotiated knows you pitch high and then compromise.<\/p>\n
I won’t accept the compromise for long. I know ministers won't either. Be under no illusion \u2014 their need for cash will drive this process. But I can live with the fact the ball is rolling for now. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"