{"id":34813,"date":"2016-09-28T07:17:12","date_gmt":"2016-09-28T06:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=34813"},"modified":"2016-09-28T07:24:58","modified_gmt":"2016-09-28T06:24:58","slug":"jerseys-black-hole-still-there-after-all-these-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2016\/09\/28\/jerseys-black-hole-still-there-after-all-these-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Jersey&#8217;s black hole: still crazy after all these years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back in 2007 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2015\/12\/09\/that-jersey-black-hole-and-my-2007-forecast-that-it-would-happen\/\" target=\"_blank\">I forecast that if Jersey continued with its tax haven policies<\/a> it would have a black hole in its finances of \u00a3119 million.<\/p>\n<p>This comes from the Jersey Evening Post this week:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2016\/09\/28\/jerseys-black-hole-still-there-after-all-these-years\/screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-07-06-42\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-34814\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-34814\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42-550x523.png\" alt=\"screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-07-06-42\" width=\"550\" height=\"523\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42-550x523.png 550w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42-315x300.png 315w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42-236x225.png 236w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42-139x132.png 139w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-28-at-07.06.42.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I accept that the issue has arisen later than I accepted, but it really is time Jersey admitted I was right, all along.<\/p>\n<p>And what is astonishing is that despite the clear and obvious evidence that the Island's economic and tax policies\u00a0have failed they are sticking to the disastrous zero \/ ten tax policy that ensures anyone from outside the Island using it as a tax haven pays no tax there as a result. This is what makes the Island 'competitive' according to \u00a0its finance industry inspired political leadership. That's why locals are going to have to pay a lot more for the privilege of subsidising tax abuse.<\/p>\n<p>Good luck to Senator Sarah Fergusson who is opposing these plans, I say.<\/p>\n<p>But in the meantime the black hole will not go away: a failed model cannot be mended by tinkering on its edges, and that is all the Island's leading politicians are doing.<\/p>\n<p><em>PS: I have been asked if the UK can do anything about this. The answer is yes: since the UK is responsible if ultimately responsible if Jersey were to default it could intervene. But we're some way from that as yet, I suspect. Although if I was a UK minister I would be demanding a careful review of the situation.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in 2007 I forecast that if Jersey continued with its tax haven policies it would have a black hole in its finances of \u00a3119<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2016\/09\/28\/jerseys-black-hole-still-there-after-all-these-years\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34813\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}