{"id":32774,"date":"2016-03-16T18:52:04","date_gmt":"2016-03-16T18:52:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=32774"},"modified":"2016-03-16T18:52:04","modified_gmt":"2016-03-16T18:52:04","slug":"a-budget-for-the-children-of-the-best-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2016\/03\/16\/a-budget-for-the-children-of-the-best-off\/","title":{"rendered":"A budget for the children of the best off"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I look at the world through the eyes of the least well off, even if I am aware that my own circumstances\u00a0are more financially fortunate.<\/p>\n<p>Today's budget will leave very large numbers of disabled people, and their families and carers, much worse off. That is the stated intention.<\/p>\n<p>And today's budget will, by seriously cutting the business rates income that is to now fund local authority services, threaten the future of many social services on which a great many people rely.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time the children of parents well enough off to be able to save \u00a34,000 a year for them will be given a straightforward gift of \u00a31,000 a year in the new younger person's ISA scheme.<\/p>\n<p>Think of it as a subsidy to the school fees.<\/p>\n<p>Or as a contribution towards the cost of going to university for the very wealthiest that the rest will never get.<\/p>\n<p>Think of it as a deliberate increase in inequality in this country.<\/p>\n<p>Think of it as something we simply cannot afford to do when so many other children live in poverty, and yet will be doing none the less.<\/p>\n<p>And hope that a big enough stink might end this planned gross injustice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I look at the world through the eyes of the least well off, even if I am aware that my own circumstances\u00a0are more financially fortunate.<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2016\/03\/16\/a-budget-for-the-children-of-the-best-off\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[127,147],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-budget","category-inequality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}