{"id":28541,"date":"2015-04-08T14:47:50","date_gmt":"2015-04-08T13:47:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=28541"},"modified":"2015-04-08T14:47:50","modified_gmt":"2015-04-08T13:47:50","slug":"has-the-non-dom-announcement-worked-for-labour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2015\/04\/08\/has-the-non-dom-announcement-worked-for-labour\/","title":{"rendered":"Has the non-dom announcement worked for Labour?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am not objective on the non-dom rule. Having worked to get rid of it for eight years it would be ludicrous of me to say I was. But <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/live\/2015\/apr\/08\/election-2015-live-blog-labour-ed-miliband-non-dom-tax-loophole\" target=\"_blank\">this series of tweets<\/a> from ITN's Tom Bradby is from someone who is no great friend of Labour, I'd say:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2015\/04\/08\/has-the-non-dom-announcement-worked-for-labour\/screen-shot-2015-04-08-at-14-43-25\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-28542\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28542\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2015-04-08 at 14.43.25\" width=\"550\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25.png 1018w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25-229x300.png 229w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25-550x720.png 550w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25-172x225.png 172w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Screen-Shot-2015-04-08-at-14.43.25-101x132.png 101w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He is right: the non-dom rule is indefensible. Even trying will have cost the Tories votes.<\/p>\n<p>And increased the chance of it going - which matters to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I am not objective on the non-dom rule. Having worked to get rid of it for eight years it would be ludicrous of me to<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2015\/04\/08\/has-the-non-dom-announcement-worked-for-labour\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-domicile"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28541\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}