{"id":26332,"date":"2014-10-09T07:29:45","date_gmt":"2014-10-09T06:29:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=26332"},"modified":"2014-10-09T07:30:22","modified_gmt":"2014-10-09T06:30:22","slug":"its-austerity-that-has-resulted-in-prolonged-recession-an-explanation-in-one-graph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2014\/10\/09\/its-austerity-that-has-resulted-in-prolonged-recession-an-explanation-in-one-graph\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s austerity that has resulted in prolonged recession: an explanation in one graph"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Office for National Statistics has revised its view of the current recession and GDP movements during this period. It's allowed to do that, for better or worse, but <a href=\"http:\/\/touchstoneblog.org.uk\/2014\/10\/new-ons-analysis-shows-coalitionausterity-impact-on-gdp-worse-than-previously-thought\/\" target=\"_blank\">as economist Geoff Tily, formerly of the Treasury and now at the TUC has noted<\/a> the revision tells a very interesting story. This graph provides the data:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-26333\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2014-10-09 at 07.15.58\" width=\"580\" height=\"389\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58.png 715w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58-447x300.png 447w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Screen-Shot-2014-10-09-at-07.15.58-197x132.png 197w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0Just click the graph for a bigger version. The X axis is quarters since the recession began and the Y axis percentage change in GDP.<\/p>\n<p>What is now clear from the new solid black line (which has replaced the old view, which is the dotted black line) is that the 2008 crisis began rapidly with a very heavy initial decline in GDP that caught everyone by surprise in 2008, and which was more severe than other recessions - whose dates are noted. But what's also clear is that before Labour was out of office the recession was tracking towards recovery remarkably like 1973 and 1979.<\/p>\n<p>The change came in early 2011 - when Labour's impact and policy was replaced by the austerity agenda of the Coalition. Suddenly the black line takes a remarkably different trajectory to the blue and red lines representing progress in 1973and 1979 and almost flat lines for a period before slowly creeping upwards.<\/p>\n<p>And this was not because the Eurozone really hit a crisis in 2011. As Geoff shows, the ONS data does not support that view. Instead it is because of a massive shortage of investment levels \u00a0precisely because of the austerity agenda in government and the rhetoric that discouraged business from investing.<\/p>\n<p>The evidence is clear: Labour had the recovery under control in 2010. The Coalition delivered austerity and the result has been lower growth, a weak recovery, a loss of investment, a decline in capacity, the creation of low value work and low productivity and a mood of economic despair. And all that was chosen and was not inevitable. That's a massive legacy of poor decision making.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Office for National Statistics has revised its view of the current recession and GDP movements during this period. It&#8217;s allowed to do that, for<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2014\/10\/09\/its-austerity-that-has-resulted-in-prolonged-recession-an-explanation-in-one-graph\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26332\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}