{"id":24463,"date":"2014-03-21T07:47:59","date_gmt":"2014-03-21T07:47:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=24463"},"modified":"2014-03-21T07:49:40","modified_gmt":"2014-03-21T07:49:40","slug":"the-eu-has-at-long-last-got-full-tax-information-exchange-and-thats-bad-news-for-the-uks-tax-havens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2014\/03\/21\/the-eu-has-at-long-last-got-full-tax-information-exchange-and-thats-bad-news-for-the-uks-tax-havens\/","title":{"rendered":"The EU has, at long last, got full tax information exchange and that&#8217;s bad news for the UK&#8217;s tax havens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have been campaigning on issues relating to the\u00a0European Union Savings Tax Directive since 2005, at least. \u00a0It was, therefore, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-03-20\/luxembourg-signs-up-to-eu-savings-tax-agreement-ending-deadlock.html\" target=\"_blank\">pleasing to note that Bloomberg could report last night<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Luxembourg\u2019s Prime Minister Xavier Bettel said his country has reached a deal with other European Union nations on the extension of a savings-tax arrangement that will require all of the bloc\u2019s 28 members to exchange data.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As they also noted:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Austria and Luxembourg had refused to sign up to the agreement before the conclusion of talks on the exchange of savings information between the EU and Switzerland and four other non-EU countries with borders on the 28-nation bloc.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The countries in question are Switzerland, Liechtenstein, San Marino,\u00a0Andorra\u00a0and\u00a0Monaco. \u00a0Luxembourg says it has now received assurances that they are all making progress towards also adopting automatic information exchange, which is, of course, inevitable under the terms of the new OECD \u00a0arrangements on this issue.<\/p>\n<p>It's \u00a0taken a long time to get this progress, and it has only happened because of wider moves, including the US \u00a0Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), but after being told for so long that we would never get such an agreement \u00a0to properly exchange information on the tax affairs of all EU citizens, including on matters relating to the companies and trusts that they own, I\u00a0take quiet satisfaction that at long last \u00a0this deal will be in place.<\/p>\n<p>It should also be noted that this really does shatter \u00a0a lot more of the secrecy in places like Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Cayman, the British Virgin Islands and so on, because all the British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies are deemed by the European Union to be part of the EU for these purposes, and as a result the UK must require that they comply fully with the terms of this new agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Day by day we inch closer to ending tax haven secrecy.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have been campaigning on issues relating to the\u00a0European Union Savings Tax Directive since 2005, at least. \u00a0It was, therefore, pleasing to note that Bloomberg<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2014\/03\/21\/the-eu-has-at-long-last-got-full-tax-information-exchange-and-thats-bad-news-for-the-uks-tax-havens\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,44,4,6,7,10,55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu-std","category-europe","category-guernsey","category-isle-of-man","category-jersey","category-tax-avoidance","category-tax-evasion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}