{"id":22601,"date":"2013-10-04T08:55:00","date_gmt":"2013-10-04T07:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=22601"},"modified":"2013-10-04T08:55:00","modified_gmt":"2013-10-04T07:55:00","slug":"france-takes-on-amazon-its-time-we-did-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/10\/04\/france-takes-on-amazon-its-time-we-did-too\/","title":{"rendered":"France takes on Amazon. It&#8217;s time we did too"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/3c173108-2c3a-11e3-acf4-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2gjk5gxTg\" target=\"_blank\">FT reports this morning<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p data-track-pos=\"0\">France\u2019s parliament has passed a law preventing internet booksellers from offering free delivery to customers, in an attempt to protect the country\u2019s struggling bookshops from the growing dominance of US online retailer\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/markets.ft.com\/tearsheets\/performance.asp?s=us:AMZN\" data-hover-chart=\"us:AMZN\">Amazon<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p data-track-pos=\"1\">On Thursday, Aur\u00c3\u00a9lie Filippetti, the culture minister who originally proposed the move,\u00a0<a title=\"French minister hits at Amazon \u2018dumping\u2019\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/intl\/cms\/s\/0\/213fc8ce-cc9d-11e2-9cf7-00144feab7de.html\">denounced Amazon for its alleged \u201cstrategy of dumping\u201d<\/a>, claiming that the company used offers of free delivery to get around French laws controlling the price of books.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking during a debate in the National Assembly, she said: \u201cOnce they are in a dominant position and have wiped out our network of bookshops, it is a strong bet that they will raise their delivery charges.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>She has this right, of course. Amazon is not acting in the interests of the market. Nor is it acting in the interests of the consumer. It is a monopolist using its capital to crush its competitors to then create the opportunity for exploitation.<\/p>\n<p>I get intensely annoyed (you may have noticed) at those who support companies like Amazon because 'profit maximisation pays' and 'free markets must be allowed to operate'.<\/p>\n<p>Such claims are deliberate distortions of the truth. They're<a title=\"Is the neo-feudalists party over? Not yet. Not by a long way.\" href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/10\/04\/is-the-neo-feudalists-party-over-not-yet-not-by-a-long-way\/\" target=\"_blank\"> part of the feudal myth<\/a>. They're about ensuring exploitation can continue.<\/p>\n<p>It's the French who are standing up for free markets here. And as I've argued, often, tax justice is in fact one of the strongest pro-market campaigns there is on this basis. It's the anti-marketeers on the neo-feudal right who deny this. It's a paradox that needs to be noted, often.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the FT reports this morning: France\u2019s parliament has passed a law preventing internet booksellers from offering free delivery to customers, in an attempt to<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/10\/04\/france-takes-on-amazon-its-time-we-did-too\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,97,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-tax-justice","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22601\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}