{"id":21807,"date":"2013-08-02T08:35:39","date_gmt":"2013-08-02T07:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=21807"},"modified":"2013-08-02T08:35:39","modified_gmt":"2013-08-02T07:35:39","slug":"the-us-senate-now-has-its-own-version-of-the-uk-transparency-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/08\/02\/the-us-senate-now-has-its-own-version-of-the-uk-transparency-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"The US Senate now has its own version of the UK Transparency Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Senators Carl Levin and\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: small;\">Chuck Grassley have tabled a Bill in the US\u00a0Senate\u00a0that is the equivalent of the <a href=\"http:\/\/services.parliament.uk\/bills\/2013-14\/unitedkingdomcorporateandindividualtaxandfinancialtransparency.html\" target=\"_blank\">UK Corporate and Individual Tax and Financial Transparency Bill <\/a>that I have written for\u00a0Michael\u00a0Meacher MP<\/span><span style=\"font-size: small;\">. Called\u00a0the Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act its aim is to\u00a0<\/span>identify<span style=\"font-size: small;\">\u00a0who owns US companies. \u00a0The bill would end the practice of the 50 States forming corporations for unidentified persons, and instead require the States to obtain the identities of the persons behind the corporations. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.levin.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press\/release\/levin-grassley-introduce-bill-to-combat-us-corporations-with-hidden-owners#sthash.PbrjyPot.dpuf\" target=\"_blank\">As they noted<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cToday, it takes more information to obtain a driver\u2019s license or open a U.S. bank account than it does to form a U.S. corporation,\u201d said Levin. \u201cOur States don\u2019t require anyone to name the owners of the corporations being formed under their laws, practically inviting people to misuse our corporations. A single State can\u2019t solve the problem on its own, because if one State starts requiring names, people seeking to use corporations for nefarious purposes can switch to another State with weaker requirements. That\u2019s why federal legislation is needed to level the playing field among the 50 States and get them to obtain corporate ownership information so it is available to law enforcement investigating corporate wrongdoing. It is past time to stop hamstringing our law enforcement by forcing them to chase U.S. corporations with hidden owners.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cProsecutors of financial crimes follow the money,\u201d Grassley said. \u201cIt\u2019s hard for them to do that when the owners of shell corporations are able to hide their identities so easily. Setting consequences for submitting false ownership information would help law enforcement by imposing a hardship on the Ponzi schemers, money launderers and tax cheats who use shell corporations to conceal their fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>States form almost two million corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) within the United States each year without asking for the identity of the owners. The Levin-Grassley bill would require the States to add a single question to their existing incorporation forms requesting the names of the natural persons -- the beneficial owners \u2014 behind the corporations being formed. States would not be required to verify the information, but penalties would apply to persons who submitted false information. Law enforcement would be given access to the information upon presentation of a subpoena or summons. Corporations bidding on federal contracts would have to provide the same beneficial ownership information to the federal government to ensure the United States knows with whom it is doing business.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It is curious that both sides of the Atlantic notice has ben given that legislators do not trust their leaders to deliver on the G8 promise on this issue. The pressure is on.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Senators Carl Levin and\u00a0Chuck Grassley have tabled a Bill in the US\u00a0Senate\u00a0that is the equivalent of the UK Corporate and Individual Tax and Financial Transparency<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/08\/02\/the-us-senate-now-has-its-own-version-of-the-uk-transparency-bill\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64,55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corporation-tax","category-tax-evasion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21807\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}