{"id":19824,"date":"2013-03-26T08:22:04","date_gmt":"2013-03-26T08:22:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=19824"},"modified":"2013-03-26T08:22:04","modified_gmt":"2013-03-26T08:22:04","slug":"for-those-who-say-there-was-no-russian-money-in-cyprus-the-ft-disagrees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/03\/26\/for-those-who-say-there-was-no-russian-money-in-cyprus-the-ft-disagrees\/","title":{"rendered":"For those who say there was no Russian money in Cyprus, the FT disagrees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I had a twitter debate with Frances Coppola over\u00a0the\u00a0weekend in\u00a0which\u00a0she claimed first that Cyprus was not a tax haven as there was no evidence of illegality,\u00a0second\u00a0that\u00a0Russian\u00a0money had not caused the crisis, \u00a0third that Greece had\u00a0precipitated\u00a0the fall (which\u00a0is only true in\u00a0the\u00a0sense of it being a tipping\u00a0point) and fourth the\u00a0Russian\u00a0money, if it\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0there, was all gone now.<\/p>\n<p>All\u00a0those\u00a0claims are wrong. But let's just deal with the last as it gives a lie to the rest. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/5007a1fc-9577-11e2-a4fa-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2Od063ytK\" target=\"_blank\">The FT says this morning<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With most banks in\u00a0<a title=\"Cyprus bailout: In depth - FT.com\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/in-depth\/cyprus-bailout\">Cyprus<\/a>\u00a0due to reopen on Thursday, the island\u2019s many Russian depositors are scheming ways to beat the looming limits on withdrawals and money transfers designed to stem a run on the banks.<\/p>\n<p>A majority of the deposits of more than \u00e2\u201a\u00ac100,000 at the Bank of Cyprus and Laiki Bank are ultimately owned by Russian <strong>beneficiaries<\/strong>, a person close to one of the lenders told the Financial Times \u2014 meaning that Russian businesses and individual depositors will be paying the lion\u2019s share of the local bailout.<\/p>\n<p>While the person said he expected Russian clients of the two lenders to lose \u00e2\u201a\u00ac3.5bn-\u00e2\u201a\u00ac4bn, Eugene Tarzimanov, a banking analyst at Moody\u2019s in Moscow, called that estimate \u201coptimistic\u201d, noting that Moody\u2019s estimates were higher.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I added the emphasis and it is key.<\/p>\n<p>Of course it does not look on the face of it that many of the funds in Cyprus are\u00a0Russian: they're\u00a0hidden\u00a0behind the secrecy of trusts and\u00a0companies\u00a0that places like Cyprus so readily provide to disguise the ownership of funds. Any banker should know that.<\/p>\n<p>And those funds are still there. Why? Because those trustees and company directors who hide the\u00a0ownership\u00a0of these funds weren't moving it anywhere for their clients: their livelihood depended on it remaining in\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0and that, I am sure, is why it's still there. A tax haven client and their trustee don't always share the same interests. Those who use these place should note that,\u00a0carefully.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had a twitter debate with Frances Coppola over\u00a0the\u00a0weekend in\u00a0which\u00a0she claimed first that Cyprus was not a tax haven as there was no evidence of<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2013\/03\/26\/for-those-who-say-there-was-no-russian-money-in-cyprus-the-ft-disagrees\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[70,80,32,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-banking","category-secrecy-jurisdictions","category-tax-havens","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}