{"id":18294,"date":"2012-11-22T10:51:11","date_gmt":"2012-11-22T10:51:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=18294"},"modified":"2012-11-22T10:51:11","modified_gmt":"2012-11-22T10:51:11","slug":"hmrcs-failure-tax-avoidance-is-increasing-year-by-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/11\/22\/hmrcs-failure-tax-avoidance-is-increasing-year-by-year\/","title":{"rendered":"HMRC&#8217;s failure: tax avoidance is increasing year by year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>HMRC has said for the last few years that closing the tax gap is its number one\u00a0objective. I think that appropriate.<\/p>\n<p>The tax gap is made up of tax paid late, tax evaded and tax avoided.<\/p>\n<p>One significant part of tax avoided is that lost to marketed tax schemes. These have had to be disclosed since 2004. If HMRC was winning you would\u00a0expect\u00a0the number of such schemes to be\u00a0going\u00a0down. As the latest <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nao.org.uk\/publications\/1213\/tax_avoidance.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">NAO report on this issue shows<\/a>, they aren't. The number in use is going up:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Screen-shot-2012-11-22-at-10.10.451.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-18296\" title=\"Screen shot 2012-11-22 at 10.10.45\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Screen-shot-2012-11-22-at-10.10.451.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"563\" height=\"605\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Screen-shot-2012-11-22-at-10.10.451.png 563w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Screen-shot-2012-11-22-at-10.10.451-279x300.png 279w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I think that's one of the clearest indicators yet of HMRC's failure to come to\u00a0terms\u00a0with tax avoidance.<\/p>\n<p>It's also notable that numbers have increased significantly under the current\u00a0government; I\u00a0suspect\u00a0people no longer think there is the willingness to tackle this issue. They also know that so many staff are being sacked at HMRC the chances of losing from using such\u00a0schemes\u00a0are low. And when there are <a title=\"Every one of the 41,000 tax avoiders identified by the National Audit Office is costing the country \u00a3248,780\" href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/11\/22\/every-one-of-the-41000-tax-avoiders-identified-by-the-national-audit-office-is-costing-the-country-248780\/\" target=\"_blank\">41,000 cases outstanding<\/a>, they're\u00a0almost\u00a0certainly\u00a0right to think so.<\/p>\n<p>When we have a\u00a0government\u00a0that is not able or (more\u00a0importantly) willing to collect tax but is willing to cut services,\u00a0benefits, education, healthcare, pensions and investment the country needs to worry.<\/p>\n<p>Now, then, is that time to worry because there are only two ways to explain this phenomena and its recent increase. One is incompetence. The other is a willingness to\u00a0turn\u00a0a blind eye to it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HMRC has said for the last few years that closing the tax gap is its number one\u00a0objective. I think that appropriate. The tax gap is<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/11\/22\/hmrcs-failure-tax-avoidance-is-increasing-year-by-year\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hmrc","category-tax-avoidance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}