{"id":16621,"date":"2012-07-31T07:34:14","date_gmt":"2012-07-31T06:34:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=16621"},"modified":"2012-07-31T07:34:14","modified_gmt":"2012-07-31T06:34:14","slug":"olympic-secrecy-of-jurisdiction-the-day-the-uk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/07\/31\/olympic-secrecy-of-jurisdiction-the-day-the-uk\/","title":{"rendered":"Olympic secrecy of jurisdiction the day: the UK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Having had a '<a title=\"Secrecy jurisdiction of the day: the Cayman Islands\" href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/07\/30\/secrecy-jurisdiction-of-the-day-the-cayman-islands\/\" target=\"_blank\">secrecy jurisdiction of the day' yesterday<\/a> I thought it worth continuing the theme, with an Olympic twist since I, amongst many others, noted just how many secrecy jurisdictions are participating in the Olympics. The following comes from the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.secrecyjurisdictions.com\/PDF\/UnitedKingdom.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Tax Justice Network\u00a0report on\u00a0the UK<\/a>\u00a0produced to\u00a0support the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.financialsecrecyindex.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Financial Secrecy Index<\/a>\u00a0and published on the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.secrecyjurisdictions.com\/jurisdictions\" target=\"_blank\">Secrecy Jurisdictions web site<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Screen-shot-2012-07-31-at-07.28.50.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-16622\" title=\"Screen shot 2012-07-31 at 07.28.50\" src=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Screen-shot-2012-07-31-at-07.28.50.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"574\" height=\"675\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Screen-shot-2012-07-31-at-07.28.50.png 574w, https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Screen-shot-2012-07-31-at-07.28.50-255x300.png 255w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.secrecyjurisdictions.com\/PDF\/UnitedKingdom.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">more, here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Having had a &#8216;secrecy jurisdiction of the day&#8217; yesterday I thought it worth continuing the theme, with an Olympic twist since I, amongst many others,<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2012\/07\/31\/olympic-secrecy-of-jurisdiction-the-day-the-uk\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[80],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-secrecy-jurisdictions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}