{"id":12202,"date":"2011-10-03T10:32:31","date_gmt":"2011-10-03T09:32:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=12202"},"modified":"2011-10-03T10:32:31","modified_gmt":"2011-10-03T09:32:31","slug":"what-is-david-cameron-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/10\/03\/what-is-david-cameron-for\/","title":{"rendered":"What is David Cameron for?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Phillip Blond is one of those annoying people (like Maurice Glasman really, and I know them both). He can say some really interesting things sometimes and then go so way off on a\u00a0tangent\u00a0you wonder what planet he's on.<\/p>\n<p>This\u00a0from an\u00a0article\u00a0in the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/uk-politics\/2011\/10\/society-social-economic\" target=\"_blank\"> New Statesman yesterday<\/a> is bang on:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>David Cameron remains an enigmatic figure who, although personally popular, is unable to offer a credible account of what he and his government stand for. At different times, he has been a progressive Conservative, a compassionate one, a \"muscular liberal\", a liberal Conservative, or a purely pragmatic politician who can easily dispense with ideology.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Blond was meant to provide Cameron with his ideas. If he's confused as to what Cameron is for you can be sure the rest of us should be.<\/p>\n<p>And you can also be sure that the Conservatives should be worried. As the Observer noted yesterday, Osborne's in the same boat - a politician who only wants power but without idea as to how to use it - which is why his policy is to stand back and watch disaster happen.<\/p>\n<p>That wins you an election once.<\/p>\n<p>But not twice.<\/p>\n<p>And I have a feeling Ed Miliband really does have a big idea now - and one that resonates. For a party that relied on Dave as it's best bet - and lost the last election despite that fact - the current void he offers voters is a nightmare waiting to happen which if it wasn't so tragic as to its current\u00a0consequences\u00a0would be fun to watch.<\/p>\n<p>As it is, the obvious fact that the UK has not got a government fit for\u00a0purpose\u00a0becomes\u00a0more apparent day by day.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Phillip Blond is one of those annoying people (like Maurice Glasman really, and I know them both). He can say some really interesting things sometimes<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/10\/03\/what-is-david-cameron-for\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservatives","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}