{"id":11864,"date":"2011-09-13T09:08:56","date_gmt":"2011-09-13T08:08:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=11864"},"modified":"2011-09-13T09:08:56","modified_gmt":"2011-09-13T08:08:56","slug":"i-beg-to-differ-mr-hartnett","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/09\/13\/i-beg-to-differ-mr-hartnett\/","title":{"rendered":"I beg to differ, Mr Hartnett"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dave Hartnett, boss of HMRC, was in front of the Treasury Select Committee yesterday defending his appalling and almost certainly illegal deal with Switzerland.<\/p>\n<p>As the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/business\/2011\/sep\/12\/hmrc-defends-tax-deal-switzerland?INTCMP=SRCH\" target=\"_blank\">Guardian note<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>HMRC permanent secretary for tax Dave Hartnett told the Treasury sub-committee on Monday that in the next 10 years breaking down Swiss banking secrecy certainly \"seemed very unlikely\".<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh yes? That's why the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.europolitics.info\/business-competitiveness\/rubik-project-may-stir-up-ill-feeling-in-union-art312406-8.html\" target=\"_blank\">EU was confident <\/a>on making progress on the\u00a0European Union Savings Tax Directive with it was it?<\/p>\n<p>As the Guardian also notes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tax campaigner Richard Murphy has argued that the deal has delayed international efforts to break down Swiss secrecy. \"I am not saying Swiss bank secrecy was going to break down tomorrow. But the US is making big progress, the direction of travel is substantially in the direction of openness. This deal has guaranteed that anonymity is reinforced,\" he said on Monday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It's true: I did say that, just before cooking supper last night.<\/p>\n<p>And I'm far from alone in thinking that far from Hartnett's deal helping, it's hindering (unless of course you're a tax evader, when it's great news). As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.europolitics.info\/business-competitiveness\/rubik-project-may-stir-up-ill-feeling-in-union-art312406-8.html\" target=\"_blank\">Europolitics note:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Luxembourg may well put a spanner in the Commission\u2019s works, though.\u00a0Its finance minister released a statement [following\u00a0the Swiss deals] noting that \u201cthe model of withholding at the source \u2014 a model Luxembourg has always defended \u2014 is a key element of the agreements,\u201d which at any rate will \u201chave an impact on the negotiations under way on the directive on taxation of savings income\u201d.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Or, he will use them to scupper advances in tax\u00a0transparency\u00a0Europe.<\/p>\n<p>Oh thanks Dave Hartnett, defender of banking secrecy and tax evader's friend as a result. Great work.<\/p>\n<p>PS Why is the deal illegal?\u00a0Because\u00a0HMRC are agreeing not to investigate more than 500 crimes a year however many they find, and that has to be ultra vires their powers - which makes the deal illegal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dave Hartnett, boss of HMRC, was in front of the Treasury Select Committee yesterday defending his appalling and almost certainly illegal deal with Switzerland. As<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/09\/13\/i-beg-to-differ-mr-hartnett\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107,63,55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hmrc","category-switzerland","category-tax-evasion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}