{"id":11686,"date":"2011-09-02T18:41:06","date_gmt":"2011-09-02T17:41:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=11686"},"modified":"2011-09-02T19:16:41","modified_gmt":"2011-09-02T18:16:41","slug":"twenty-years-of-private-pensions-have-only-made-the-rich-richer-and-nhs-reform-will-do-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/09\/02\/twenty-years-of-private-pensions-have-only-made-the-rich-richer-and-nhs-reform-will-do-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"Twenty years of private pensions have only made the rich richer &#8211; and NHS reform will do the same"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Phillip Inman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/business\/2011\/aug\/31\/stock-lending-short-selling-city-reform\" target=\"_blank\">noted in the Guardian y<\/a>esterday that it was entirely possible for someone to have saved for twenty years in a personal pension using an actively managed fund and for their investment now only to be worth what they paid\u00a0into the fund. Indeed, that is not just possible but likely since most managed funds have seriously\u00a0under-performed\u00a0the FTSE indices before charges are taken into account.<\/p>\n<p>As I have shown, the subsidy to the pension industry form the tax payer each year is enormous: some \u00a338 billion in a year <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financeforthefuture.com\/MakingPensionsWork.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">when last I looked. <\/a><\/p>\n<p>And as Philip Inman rightly notes, vast amounts of that have been used to pay management fees, brokers fees and commissions all of which have enriched the financial services industry and none of which have\u00a0produced a return for pensioners - many of whom will face poverty in old age because their funds have been stolen (I use the word deliberately) by the City.<\/p>\n<p>Why say this again? For three reasons. First,\u00a0because\u00a0it says massive pension reform is needed to stop this abuse. That is possible - Dutch pensioners get 50% more pension for their investment than do UK based pensioners because they are not ripped off as we are.<\/p>\n<p>Second, to say that as a result the refusal to consider the pension reforms <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financeforthefuture.com\/MakingPensionsWork.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">I recommend<\/a> - requiring that at least 25% of all new pension contributions made in the UK go into new investment that will result in new investment and job creation in the real economy - is absurd. The result to pensioners is bound to be better than now and yet even those who should be horrified with current pension abuse cannot see that they have a duty to support such change.<\/p>\n<p>Third to make the point that in the 1980s we were told that private pension funds would solve all pension problems, no one would be exploited and the world would be a better place for the private pension revolution. We were lied to by a Tory government. we're being lied to again by a Tory government now who are saying that NHS reform will result in efficiencies, savings, no charges and a better service. That's not true. It's not possible that it can be true. I'll be exploring why in some\u00a0depth\u00a0in the Courageous State.\u00a0But still the lies are rolled out. And what will actually happen is something like the pension debacle - the rich will get richer and the est of us will get\u00a0a lousy service leading to desperation at the prospect of real loss of well-being we once enjoyed.<\/p>\n<p>You have been warned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Phillip Inman noted in the Guardian yesterday that it was entirely possible for someone to have saved for twenty years in a personal pension using<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/09\/02\/twenty-years-of-private-pensions-have-only-made-the-rich-richer-and-nhs-reform-will-do-the-same\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96,128,29,106,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservatives","category-nhs","category-pensions","category-politics","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}