{"id":11035,"date":"2011-07-13T14:13:22","date_gmt":"2011-07-13T13:13:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/?p=11035"},"modified":"2011-07-13T14:13:22","modified_gmt":"2011-07-13T13:13:22","slug":"tax-havens-new-pcs-report-sets-out-the-problems-and-the-solutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/07\/13\/tax-havens-new-pcs-report-sets-out-the-problems-and-the-solutions\/","title":{"rendered":"Tax havens: new PCS report sets out the problems, and the solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcs.org.uk\/en\/campaigns\/tax-justice\/\" target=\"_blank\">PCS launched<\/a> its new t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcs.org.uk\/taxhavens\" target=\"_blank\">ax haven report <\/a>last night in the House of Commons. I declare an interest here, I wrote it.<\/p>\n<p>I talk about what I said at the launch last night <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.forbes.com\/richardmurphy\/2011\/07\/13\/tackling-tax-havens\/\" target=\"_blank\">on my Forbes blog today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But the most important thing about the report is that it is solution focused. I\u2019ve never been interested in simply, discussing problems to which I have no solutions. I want reform and the report suggests no less than 18 of these, split into groups as follows:<\/p>\n<p><strong>International reforms<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The      UK should now demand Tax Information Exchange Agreements with all      identified secrecy jurisdictions so that they are forced to raise their      standards of information exchange;<\/li>\n<li>Improved      standards of information exchange should be developed, including multilateral      agreements between countries so that complex enquiries can be raised      simultaneously in all countries involved;<\/li>\n<li>Automatic      information exchange should be put in place so that each country has to      report to the country where a person really lives any source of income      arising which they might have that is located outside their normal country      of residence. As a result, for example, all tax haven bank accounts would      have to be notified to the countries where their owners live. Nothing      could be more effective in stopping tax evasion by individuals.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>UK domestic law<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The      UK\u2019s domicile rule, that helps make this country a tax haven, should be      abolished;<\/li>\n<li>The      UK\u2019s tax residence laws should be reformed to make it harder for people to      leave the UK and claim tax haven residence;<\/li>\n<li>Introduce      general anti-avoidance principles into UK tax law to tackle artificial use      of tax haven structures;<\/li>\n<li>UK      law should require significantly better disclosure from UK companies and      trusts so that we set the international standard for transparency by which      others can then be judged;<\/li>\n<li>H      M Revenue &amp; Customs should promote a Code of Conduct for all involved      in tax management that requires tax compliance, which this report defines      as seeking to pay the right amount of tax (but no more) in the right place      at the right time where right means that the economic substance of the      transactions undertaken coincides with the place and form in which they      are reported for taxation purposes. There should be greater scrutiny for      those who refuse to participate, including professional advisers;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Investing in tackling abuse<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Increased      resources to be made available to HM Revenue &amp; Customs to tackle tax      haven \/ secrecy jurisdiction abuse as well as tax avoidance and evasion in      general;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Reform in the UK\u2019s tax havens<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The      UK must demand an increase in the level of corporate transparency in the UK\u2019s      Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories to match that now found in the      UK;<\/li>\n<li>The      UK must create a Registers of Trusts, equivalent to the current Register      of Companies, and demand that its related territories do the same since      trusts are still commonly used for tax avoidance;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>European reform<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The      UK must support reform of the EU Savings Tax Directive so that all      affected jurisdictions must offer automatic information exchange in full      and this must be extended to companies and trusts and not just be applied      to individuals;<\/li>\n<li>The      UK must promote geographic extension of the European Union Savings Tax      Directive to as many countries as possible, including those outside the      European Union;<\/li>\n<li>The      UK should support the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax      Base within Europe to tackle the problem of transfer pricing and tax      avoidance between member states and should demand its extension beyond the      European Union to ensure that tax haven abuse is eliminated by the use of      this form of tax computation;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Accounting reform<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The      UK must actively demand that the European Union, the International      Accounting Standards Board, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and      Development and stock exchanges must all require that multinational      corporations prepare their accounts on a \u2018country-by-country\u2019 basis so we      would know how much profit and tax was paid in each country in which they      have operations. This would tackle the biggest single cause of corporate      tax avoidance through what is called transfer pricing, would highlight the      tax haven activities of companies, and would provide data on comparative      labour conditions worldwide;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Financial services regulation<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Credit      card companies should be held to account for the use of their cards from      offshore jurisdictions and be required to provide information on the      beneficial ownership of those cards on demand, irrespective of their place      of issue;<\/li>\n<li>The      tax profession should clarify their approach to tax haven activity and      make clear the limits to professional good conduct in such places;<\/li>\n<li>Secrecy      jurisdiction banks and financial services institutions should be regulated      from major financial centres such as London if that is where their parent      company headquarters are located.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This is an ambitious package of reform. PCS is proposing it because it believes that the cost of inaction is now much higher than the cost of action. This report suggests that whilst the current economic crisis did, inevitably, have its causes in the major world economies, those secrecy jurisdictions that played an extensive role in repackaging sub-prime debt (Cayman and Jersey being of significance in this respect amongst British jurisdictions) played a major part in creating the climate of mistrust that precipitated the global financial failure which is now imposing an enormous burden on ordinary people throughout the world. This cost cannot be ignored, nor can the risk that it might recur be taken. That's why we need reform, now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PCS launched its new tax haven report last night in the House of Commons. I declare an interest here, I wrote it. I talk about<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2011\/07\/13\/tax-havens-new-pcs-report-sets-out-the-problems-and-the-solutions\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tax-havens"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11035\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}