{"id":101,"date":"2006-08-21T09:58:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-21T07:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2006\/08\/21\/more-jersey-hypocrisy\/"},"modified":"2011-04-26T19:16:21","modified_gmt":"2011-04-26T18:16:21","slug":"more-jersey-hypocrisy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2006\/08\/21\/more-jersey-hypocrisy\/","title":{"rendered":"More Jersey hypocrisy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Jersey Financial Services Commission has published a new draft Code of Practice for the 190 trust companies that undertake business in that island.<\/p>\n<p>The key elements are as follows:<\/p>\n<p><em>4.1.2 The draft Codes retain six fundamental principles for trust company business:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>- A registered person must conduct its business with integrity;<\/em><br \/>\n<em> - A registered person must have due regard for the interests of its customers;<\/em><br \/>\n<em> - A registered person must organise and control its affairs effectively for the proper performance of its business activities and be able to demonstrate the existence of adequate risk management systems;<\/em><br \/>\n<em> - A registered person must be transparent in its business arrangements;<\/em><br \/>\n<em> - A registered person must maintain, and be able to demonstrate the existence of, adequate capital resources; and<\/em><br \/>\n<em> - A registered person is expected to deal with the Commission and other authorities in the Bailiwick in an open and co-operative manner.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>4.1.3 In addition, the following seventh principle has been added, under which will be structured codes relating to the advertising of products and services:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>- A registered person must not make statements that are misleading, false or deceptive.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Now let's for one moment compare this with the requirements of Jersey's new trust laws which (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2006\/06\/15\/jersey-passes-law-allowing-%E2%80%98sham%E2%80%99-trusts-for-use-by-tax-evaders\/\" target=\"_blank\">as noted previously on this blog<\/a>) allow a trust company to run a trust where:<\/p>\n<p>1) the trustee can accept they act entirely in accordance with the settlor's instructions and so pretend to be a trustee when they're not and<br \/>\n2) they must return the trust property on demand to the settlor, in complete denial of all the principles of trusts.<\/p>\n<p>It's pretty hard to reconcile such naked abuse of normally accepted trust law with:<\/p>\n<p>- integrity;<br \/>\n- transparency;<br \/>\n- openness and co-operation;<br \/>\n- an absence of misleading statements, deception or falsehoods.<\/p>\n<p>But this is Jersey, and normal standards do not, of course, apply.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to Chris Steel for drawing this to my attention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Jersey Financial Services Commission has published a new draft Code of Practice for the 190 trust companies that undertake business in that island. The<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/2006\/08\/21\/more-jersey-hypocrisy\/\"><em> Read the full article&#8230;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,7,32,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics","category-jersey","category-tax-havens","category-trusts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.taxresearch.org.uk\/Blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}