A smug of economists

Posted on

Steve Keen asked me if I had come across someone called Tim Worstall yesterday. The context was a blog post he was writing on neoliberal trolls, which is out this morning.

I mentioned I was familiar with Tim Worstall, although I had never met the man, and have no desire to do so.

I rather suspect he would like to meet me. It would seem that he has written well over 4,000 blog posts about me on his blog, all identified by the hashtag ‘Ragging Ritchie'.

I have no idea what can drive such an obsession. Is it admiration? Or a deep-seated fear that I might be right? Maybe it's dread that I could win the argument. What I do know is that this exceptionally strange behaviour has beengoing on for years.

Steve discusses what to call such sad obsessive who remain so dedicated to the economics that they learned during their future year undergraduate courses in his post today. He suggests that they be called a smug of economists, noting:

They are smug because they believe that mainstream, "Neoclassical" economics is an accurate model of the real world, and therefore anyone who criticises it must be wrong.

That will do for me. It's a suitable term for people so far removed from awareness of reality that they must be smug to presume they're right when the evidence screams to the contrary.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here: