I am a signatory to this statement, published yesterday in The Ecologist. I also had involvement in its drafting, although I am not an author. After careful consideration I did, however, decide I could endorse it:
Principles for post-Covid Britain
The coronavirus crisis is a massive shot across the bows of the world as we know it. In response we can no longer afford to take timid steps. Bold, concerted action is the only responsible way forward.
We, along with the signatories listed below, therefore propose the following principles for a post-pandemic United Kingdom, with examples of how they might be implemented.
These are, we believe, principles that all can agree to, principles emerging from the emergency itself. This is not a shopping list of policies, about which there will be contention; this is a sketch of the deep necessary change that our time calls for, an agenda we can all share:
Causes
There will be many more crises like this one if we don't change course. This pandemic is linked to habitat destruction, creating opportunities for the spread of the virus.
Economic globalisation has made economies very vulnerable to disruption in supply chains, and air travel has enabled Covid-19 to spread at unprecedented lightning speed. Extreme inequality has meant that large sections of the population lack the resilience to properly cope with crisis conditions, whilst austerity policies of cuts to public services have undermined the capacity of health services and local government to respond.
Despite pandemics and epidemics appearing many times on official risk registers, the short-termism of most politics has prevented adequate precautions from being put in place by governments. The climate emergency has already caused droughts, floods, and forest fires, and these can be expected to worsen as more and more carbon is put into the atmosphere.
Decarbonisation
All plans to rebuild the economy after the coronavirus crisis must be designed to simultaneously decarbonize the economy and restore ecosystems and biodiversity.
We must use this as an opportunity to build a different kind of economy - an economy that prioritises human wellbeing and ecological stability. If we ‘solve' the coronavirus crisis and its economic impacts by worsening the longer emergency of the ecological crisis (including the climate emergency), we will have achieved less than nothing.
There is no point leaving the frying pan of the covid crisis only to jump into the flames of ecological
breakdown.
The postponement of this year's big international climate and biodiversity COP conferences is a worrying sign of the possible postponement of ecological concern — at a time when we simply cannot afford any delays.
Work
We must change how we travel and work, without resorting to bailouts for high-carbon industries. As we emerge from this terrible corona crisis, let's bake-in and expand the incidental benefit felt by some of reduced air pollution, reduced levels of motor and air traffic, more quiet, more leisure time, more space for nature.
Transport in future must not rely on the private car, let alone on air travel. High-carbon companies wanting to return to business should not be helped by government assistance. Employees who wish to continue working from home should be actively facilitated to do so.
Care
The virus crisis has helped us realise what's important, what really matters in our lives. It has shown us (in neighbours supporting each other, in mutual-aid groups, in hundreds of thousands volunteering for the NHS) how we care about each other.
Similarly, the crisis has revealed which jobs really matter, and which matter much less. It can nolonger be acceptable for City traders to earn hundreds of times more than nurses or shelf-stackers. Our collective priorities have changed.
Action
We support calls for a full independent public inquiry on the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. Plans for how we emerge from the corona crisis should have a precautionary dimension: let's plan on suppressing or eliminating future corona outbreaks, let's be prepared to nip future pandemics in the bud – and to prevent further climate breakdown and mass extinction so far as possible.
We need radical targets for the reduction of climate-deadly greenhouse gas-pollution and of biodiversity-destruction.
We have seen in the Covid-crisis how incredibly fast and radically governments and the public can act, and we have seen the damage wrought by not asking quickly enough. We have implemented measures that would have been deemed ‘politically impossible' a few months ago. That kind and scale of action is precisely what is needed in order to safeguard us against future emergencies.
Assemblies
Citizens assemblies must be convened to chart the bold way forward, on the basis of these principles. The UK Government, like virtually every other government across the world, was elected in a different world — the pre-coronavirus world. Governments should turn to citizens to decide how, together, we'll make the post-coronavirus world.
Citizens' Assemblies are more representative of the population than elected bodies, whilst not being subject to the pressure to win elections or please funders. Citizens' assemblies locally, nationally and globally should be convened as soon as possible to figure out how to convert these principles into a raft of rapid, deep action-points.
Citizens, chosen at random (like a jury) informed by experts, and deliberating together, should be empowered to come up with a plan for the path forward, post-corona. For example: should pro-globalisation infrastructure plans (e.g. new runways) be shelved, permanently? Should there be a frequent flyer levy so that those still travelling by air the most pay by far the most? Should there be a high basic income, or a low one (or none at all)?
Should there be universal basic services? Should there be preparations for food-rationing (as a precautionary measure)? Should agroecology be massively publicly subsidised? Should industrial animal agriculture be systematically reduced?
Citizens assemblies can investigate these questions and more, questions that society hitherto has tended to duck, in a way that will enable the buy-in of all to a radically repurposed future.
Collective
People tend to assume that they themselves hold values that are good for the community, values that are caring, but that others' values are more selfish. But the amazing human response to the corona crisis — especially in our communities and in the caring professions -- has exploded that myth of selfishness.
So the time is now to create a better society in the face of this emergency, a society reflecting those values that we all share. This ‘unmanifesto' is a set of principles that all can agree to, going beyond party politics.
These principles are based on the experience of the emergency we are currently going through and the more fundamental, longer, unavoidable emergencies that underlie it. This terrible, precious moment of the world economy being paused is a unique opportunity, possibly the last opportunity, to get things right. Let's not blow it.
Let's seize this moment to bring the nations and the generations together. We must protect the old through the coronavirus crisis; and protect the young through a future which, if the vision sketched here is realised, can even yet be better than ever.
So let's not blow this chance. This should be a collective effort, with the private sector, philanthropists, charities, unions, governments and all of us playing a role. We aspire for this ‘unmanifesto' to be implemented by governments; for governments to have the wisdom to create Citizens Assemblies that will chart a way forward, on the basis of the principles we've laid out.
But the rest of us should not wait passively for governments to act. We must do what we can to realise these principles starting now: in our communities and workplaces, in our counties and on our streets, in our nations and in our homes.
Signatories
Prof. Rupert Read, University of East Anglia and author, This Civilization is Finished
Prof. Jason Hickel, Goldsmith's, University of London and author, The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions
Prof. Victor Anderson, Anglia Ruskin University
Dr. Caroline Lucas MP
Sir Jonathon Porritt, former Director, The Sustainable Development Commission
Prof. Richard Murphy, author, The Courageous State: Rethinking Economics, Society and the Role of Government
Prof. David Graeber, author, Bullshit Jobs
Baroness Natalie Bennett
Baroness Jenny Jones
Prof. Julia Steinberger, IPCC author
Helena Norberg-Hodge, author, Ancient Futures.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
[…] What we do not need to do is go back to the old 'normal'. […]
I have been a supporter of FOE since the 1970s and later Greenpeace, Practical Action and Tree aid so I endorse your analysis and hope you can persuade more influential and powerful people of the necessity not to revert to our consumer society ways. Definite proposals and ideas are needed together with the citizens assemblies but I dear these may take a few years to materialise , great to be in touch excellent work. Ann Cohen
Thanks
I can’t disagree with any of the sentiments expressed. But, sadly, I can’t see the UK government doing anything. Maybe, other countries will.
Craig
I have just witnessed Grant Shapps announce the government’s post covid19 green initiative…. It’s to develop biofuels by growing feed crops in Lincolnshire to provide biofuels for aviation. FFS…it’s being proposed to grow grain not just to feed livestock but to feed aeroplanes as well. Ah well, post Brexit Britain will just have to go hungry to allow us all to carry on flying. Where do these f***ing numpties think the UK is going to get its food from? Tim Lang must be tearing his hair out.
Tim will not be alone
I despair
Can I ask for a little clarification on the Citizens Assemblies:
– I understand from the post that the assemblies are being convened to chart the way forward of the principles outlined and the members are to be selected randomly.
– Who manages the selection process? What if someone selected is known to be fundamentally opposed to one of the principles stated?
– What happens if the selected members decide (say) that additional runways should be built i.e. they don’t agree with some of the principles?
– How will the structure of local, national & global assemblies work. Who decides on the way forward if there is disagreement between the assemblies. Is there some process of voting?
–
This was my big concern
The aim is that these are advisory, not binding
If these became policy clearly there would need to be a randomised process of representation
Before then the process would, I think, be dependent on significant participation
But I stress, I was assured the logic is advice, not decision making
These principles should inform our demands at the mass virtual lobby of MPs being co-ordinated by the Climate Coalition on 30 June.
Much sense collectively spoken. I find one element problematic:
The notion of citizens’ assemblies developing deliberative democracy is attractive, but I do wonder what criteria would be used to chose the expert input into them; and who would decide this?
This was my concern
I discussed it
It was agreed that this does need attention
I am open minded, but it would have to be agreed upon
This doesn’t directly address the concerns people have about various aspects of a citizens assembly, but if anyone who hasn’t done so is interested in seeing one in action on the subject of climate change here’s a link through which all videos, slides and transcripts can be accessed
https://www.climateassembly.uk
Cool. I like it.