Rebecca Long-Bailey launched her campaign to be Labour leader with an article in Tribune, published overnight. It was better than her false start in the Guardian, but that would not have been hard. And, right from the outset she made clear what she means to campaign on:
Labour's Green New Deal, our plans to radically democratise the economy and to renew the high streets of towns across the country are the foundations for an economic transformation that will combat the climate crisis and hand back wealth and power to ordinary people.
What is immediately apparent from the piece is that the crass description of Labour's programme as a ‘Green Industrial Revolution' has been dropped. I decried this recently, saying:
Let me be precise as to my criticism. First, no one else but Labour is talking about a Green Industrial Revolution. So it must be something different from the Green New Deal most people think we need.
Second, that difference would appear to arise because Labour do, indeed, see this as a bit of industrial policy. In fact, they see it as an excuse for a bit of post-Keynesian investment-led growth.
And, third, that's not remotely what the Green New Deal is.
Long-Bailey clearly agrees. She continued, saying:
It is true that one reason we lost the election was that Labour's campaign lacked a coherent narrative. But this was a failure of campaign strategy, not of our socialist programme. Labour's Green New Deal is the mostambitious agenda for tackling climate change of any major political party. And throughout the election it was tragically undersold.
Not only did it provide a compelling frame for our entire economic programme, it was most popular in those deindustrialised regions where we suffered our most devastating losses: the North West, the West Midlands and the North East. The popularity of our Green New Deal bridges the divides in our electoral coalition, with huge support in the cities and marginals in the South East too. It should have been a core part of our offer: this is how Labour will help you take back control.
I stress, I am not saying as a result I am endorsing Long-Bailey. But she is clearly going to be influential, and the bookies have her second in this race right now (not that coming second did Owen Smith any good). What is important is the change in emphasis. We do not need some post Keynesian growth. We need a Green New Deal. I hope the rest of Labour now gets it and the McDonnell / Corbyn line is dropped.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
It was a great shame that Labour didn’t understand the Green New Deal sufficiently to be able to sell this on the doorstep etc.
Plus the throwing in of the WASPIs, free broadband and fast track nationalisation very much muddied the message to make it all unbelievable.
I hope that whoever comes through to lead Labour will be confident enough to listen and engaging enough to connect.
I hope you are right, but I’m not yet convinced she has properly understood the difference. Yesterday on the Today programme she started well, promoting the notion of the Green New Deal but by the end of the interview she had lapsed into talking about the Green Industrial Revolution. Merely a slip of the tongue? Let us hope so.
See what I have just posted
Yeah, but this is progress, part on an historic transition. We don’t have to be too nitpicky about it. Some encouragement is in order. Its good to see that Richard has taken an encouraging tone here.
[…] wrote yesterday suggesting that Rebecca Long-Bailey got her approach to the Green New Deal right when launching her […]