It’s easier to get data on UK companies with bank accounts in Cayman than Stockport

Posted on

There's  a perverse consequence of the new rules on beneficial ownership of companies announced today.  Because the government has not adopted my recommendation that all UK banks should be required to supply information on the beneficial ownership of the companies to whom they provide banking services  but the government has, at the same time, signed information sharing agreements with places like the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man, it will now be easier for HMRC  to find out who is the beneficial owner of a company banking in Cayman  than it will be to find out the same information regarding  UK companies that bank in Stockport, Plymouth, Norwich,  Cardiff or Glasgow.

This is absurd.  We now require banks in all of these territories to exchange information with their own governments  for onward supply to the UK when it concerns companies under UK beneficial ownership,  and we are also requiring all financial institutions in the UK to exchange that information  with the UK government concerning US owned  companies  so that we can send that information to Washington  but we are not apparently not willing to require that UK banks supply this information to Companies House to make sure that fraud, crime and tax evasion are rooted out of the UK economy.

To allow this  absurd situation to have arisen when all the systems to secure the  necessary data  are already in place is almost  incomprehensible,  but that is exactly what the government is doing.

It really is time we got serious about tax evasion, but this government isn't.