The Association of Revenue and Customs is the part of the First Division Association the senior staff and managers at H M Revenue & Customs. In other words, this is the union of for HMRC's bosses.
They have issued a damning report today on the proposed general anti-avoidance principle put forward by Graham Aaranson QC last year which now forms the basis of the consultation that the government is proposing on this issue. As they say in a remarkably clear and succinct report:
In December 2010 the Government asked Graham Aaronson QC to lead a review to consider introducing a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) into the UK tax system. His Report recommended a ‘narrow' principle, centred on tackling ‘egregious, or very aggressive, tax avoidance schemes.' This GAAR would have safeguards built in to protect taxpayers, and be assisted in its operation by an Advisory Panel. The Government has accepted these proposals and will set out detailed proposals for consultation in summer 2012 with a view to legislating in Finance Bill 2013.
ARC believes the proposal, and the concept of “responsible” tax planning, may widen percep- tions of what is responsible tax planning and so make it harder to tackle avoidance. We suggest the Advisory Panel will cause taxpayers additional uncertainty and delay, as well as conflict with the current judicial process for appeal. Like HMG, ARC wants to tackle avoidance (very con- servatively estimated at £5bn each year). We recommend instead a wider GAAR, fully resourced and able to provide taxpayers with clearances so as to provide more and early certainty on how HMRC views transactions. A narrow GAAR may otherwise serve to legitimise what is currently held to be avoidance. In other words, under the guise of tackling avoidance, it may actually facilitate it.
I agree.
This is a GAAR that won't do what it says on the tin.
We need a real one. And I'm glad the top professionals at HMRC are standing up and saying that. I'm also pleased that this gives a very clear message that the problems which I highlight, time and again, at HMRC are not because of the quality of the people they employ, but because of the political capture of the very top of this organisation where, in particular, the Board has almost nobody on it who understand anything about tax. This is the problem that has to be tackled.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Spot on. As I have commented before: the HMRC board has effectively been privatised, with nearly all the key decision makers coming from a big business background. This is very likely to influence the stance it adopts on tax avoidance for instance. If people wonder why it often seems out of touch, they may wish to note that the Director in charge of debt collection strategy comes from the tax avoidance apologists, Barclays; HMRC are happy to have their estate managed for profit by a company (Mapeleys) registered in a tax haven; and the contract for mobile phones for their staff is with Vodafone, tax avoiders par excellence.
Richard, you may be interested to know that their CIO, Phil Pavitt, has been asked to think in radical terms what HMRC may should look like in 2020 in relation to Customers, Its target operating model, its role in society, and relationship to Government. Whilst I am not sure he will beat down your door to ask your opinion on this, I would be very interested for your views.
[…] Because it won’t. Richard received a letter from The Association of Revenue and Customs, which is basically all the big bosses at HMRC, and they’ve said that not only will the new GAAR NOT prevent tax avoidance, it will actually help encourage it. Read the full blog here. […]