This letter is in the Guardian this morning from Caroline Lucas:
With the global climate crisis growing ever more urgent, the sharp rise in the UK's carbon emissions in 2010 is deeply worrying – and raises serious questions about the progress being made in our energy and climate change policy (Britain's greenhouse gas emissions in shock 3.1% rise, 8 February). The rise in emissions from home heating is especially alarming when you consider that, by the government's own admission, loft lagging will fall by 93% when the Green Deal starts. If we are to stand any chance of improving the efficiency of our homes and tackling fuel poverty, the new energy and climate secretary, Ed Davey, must make it a personal priority to strengthen this weak and underfunded programme so it delivers a good deal for households.
The fact that a six-month shutdown of the Sizewell nuclear reactor was partly to blame for the recorded rise in emissions is yet another reason for the government to ditch its belief that nuclear can deliver the secure, reliable and low-carbon energy we need for the future.
This week, the Bank of England is expected to announce a new batch of quantitative easing to the tune of £50bn or more. A new report from the Green New Deal Group and Southampton University economics professorRichard Werner, who coined the term quantitative easing, is calling for such cash to be injected into green investment to support badly needed renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Rather than handing the money over to the banks, who then sit on it, green QE would put money into the wider economy – creating thousands of new jobs, improving energy security and tackling climate change at the same time.
Caroline Lucas MP
Green, Brighton Pavilion
I warmly endorse the idea that green quantitative easing has to be part of the next round of investment in our economy. It's a shame the Bank of England and Chancellor do not. Their failure will have cost for us all in the long term, unless we're a banker, of course.