The Treasury has closed a tax avoidance scheme that could have cost £1.5bn after a tip off that artificial trading companies were being set up in tax havens.
Wealthy individuals were planning to use a long-standing “post-cessation trade relief” — designed for tradesman and professionals to offset legitimate costs against their income — to artificially reduce their tax bills.
It is understood that tax experts planned to raise fake expenditure requests from a tax haven that could be claimed against by individuals in the UK.
David Gauke, Exchequer Secretary, said the schemes would have put a “significant” amount of money at risk.
“It is unacceptable, at a time when we are trying to bring down the deficit, that there are those who try to avoid paying the tax they owe,” he said.
David Gauke and I don't often agree: on this one we do.
Let's not beat about the bush, what was proposed here was fraud.
Who proposed the fraud? Tax professionals did.
Where were they going to locate the fraud? In tax havens.
How were they going to get away with it? Because tax haven secrecy - the total opacity on the ownership, control and accounts of offshore companies that they provide - would have let them do so.
And you winder why I and the Tax Justice Network campaign against tax havens? They remain what they always have been, a home for fraud assisted by a pinstripe mafia of lawyers, accountants and bankers.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Lets be quite frank – you have no idea that the scheme was designed by tax professionals – for all we know it could have been designed by anybody. Tarring all tax professionals like this is a little hasty.
How about naming them so we can judge whether they are actually tax professionals or not.
HMRC haven’t
And read the reports
This was clearly a marketed scheme. The scale of anticipated losses could not have happened otherwise
In what way is it sensible to describe a legal tax avoidance scheme, ‘fraud’?
Fraud is deception
Deception need not be illegal
It’s still fraud though
Latest promotion from the Isle of Man government, setting out, in the words of the Chief Minister, its “attractive corporate package to facilitate business for Korean companies exporting into Europe”:
http://www.gov.im/lib/news/cso/isleofmansettobe.xml
“THE Island’s thriving economy will be showcased to an international television audience following this week’s visit by a film crew from the Korean Broadcasting System (KBS).”
More Manx-speak from the Chief Minister:
“We are a small and nimble country with the ability to identify niche sectors that could be mutually beneficial. We already have strong business connections with Korea through our shipping industry and I believe there is potential to develop that relationship into other areas.’ “
Or to put it another way – we work out how to get round the law of other countries because nothing really happens here
🙂