I spoke at #occupylondon this morning outside St Paul's Cathedral.
I, and my family, had a great time there. It was a relaxed morning. You could not have asked for a nicer autumn morning in London and I had a great audience for what I found to be an exciting exchange of ideas that over-ran its schedule until the BBC asked me to go and do a live broadcast.
Throughout I emphasised what those campaigning can demand. I believe in practical, pragmatic, deliverable politics. And I believe there is a very great deal that those with empathic concern for the people of this country can demand. I'll come back to some of those issues soon, but I have to touch on an issue that vexed me throughout last week and now utterly perplexes me, and that is the way in which St Paul's have managed this situation.
For all those saying St Paul's was not the target of this protest I say you're quite right: it wasn't, and it isn't. The London Stock Exchange was, and rightly so. And the fact that the free right to walk the pavements of London around the Stock Exchange has been suspended is sure sign of how effective that targeting has been. For those in doubt, the camp is 200 metres or so from the LSX: it just so happens that St Paul's is even closer.
But, once camp was made where it is and not as planned 100 metres away in Paternoster Square St Paul's came into the frame. I've said, and I'll repeat it: St Paul's had only one duty in this situation and that was to welcome the protest and to open its doors as a place of sanctuary to all those undertaking it. The Christian teaching is explicit: if the church is to fulfill its duty to the poor then that is what if must do.
But of course, after one rather ambiguous moment on the first day of the protest when Giles Fraser appeared to tell the police to back off the Cathedral has made a PR disaster out of the situation it has created for itself.
Today was perfect example of this. The Cathedral is supposedly closed because of the health and safety concerns they have that supposedly have left them with no choice but close the cathedral on legal grounds.
Well, let's be clear, the entrances and exits to the Cathedral were wide and clear this morning. Thousands could have gone in, and out, without problem.
And let's also be clear, every business with premises around the Cathedral likely to have been open on a Sunday morning was open. Not one seemed to be concerned at the health and safety risk. None were turning people away. Finding a loo was easy - if you bought a coffee. And there were plenty of places selling it.
You have to ask the simple question - how come the Cathedral had been advised to close when M&S, Starbucks, Pizza Express and many others were open? What was the difference? All these are trading in close proximity without any apparent concern.
The one thing that can safely be concluded is that Giles Fraser, Canon of the Cathedral, was right yesterday when he said yesterday:
Those who are claiming the decision to close the cathedral has been made for commercial reasons are talking complete nonsense.
Of course that's nonsense. No one has said they've closed for commercial reasons. And candidly they are simply not telling the truth when they say they have shut for health and safety reasons - a claim that lacks any hint of credibility, at all. They're shut for one reason and one reason only, and that is politics. No other explanation is possible.
The press suggestion tonight that:
Officials from St Paul's Cathedral and the wider City district are considering legal action to force protesters to remove a camp set up outside the church more than a week ago, following an impasse between the two sides.
There is no impasse: people are exercising their right to protest. That's fundamental to democracy. When you deny the right to protest, to assemble, to deliver your message then you challenge democracy itself.
Here is nothing at this moment more profoundly political that the Cathedral could do. If they take this action they make clear on whose side they are. Giles Fraser will be shown to be a hypocrite when he said yesterday:
I remain firmly supportive of the right of people peacefully to protest. But given the strong advice that we have received that the camp is making the cathedral and its occupants unsafe then this right has to be balanced against other rights and responsibilities too. The Christian gospel is profoundly committed to the needs of the poor and the dispossessed. Financial justice is a gospel imperative.
And then he sides with the greatest oppressor of the people of this country (the City of London) to suppress that right to protest peacefully in a way that cannot in any way possible be threatening to his Cathedral, and which in no possible way justifies the suspension of Christian worship in his church? It is simply impossible for his comment to have any credibility in that context.
So, the only possible interpretation of the action of the Cathedral is that it is political. This, incidentally, is unsurprising. The Cathedral's Dean is Graeme Knowles. He was formerly Bishop of Sodor and Man - and yes that does mean the Isle of Man where I can find no record of his opposing its tax haven activity and where he did sit in the Tynwald and is not recorded as opposing the tax abuse that legislature facilitates. No wonder he was an ideal candidate for the post of Dean of St Paul's - and no wonder he appears to feel so comfortable with the mechanisms of financial exclusion and abuse promoted by so many of his near neighbours, many of whom appear on his list of sponsors.
So yes, let's be clear: I am suggesting that the only plausible explanation for St Paul's acting as it is must be that it is acting in association with the City of London to close down this demonstration. Nothing could be more profoundly political. It's moving onto very dangerous ground. Not least because it is not at all clear that for all the risk that action to suppress democratic freedom by the church will entail that they will actually win.
So let's look at the hole the church is digging. It's on the one hand shut on wholly spurious grounds and how it can now reopen is hard to say. When you spin a yarn as big as that one how on earth do you justify reopening, even though all those around you never apparently saw the threat in the first place? It's almost impossible for the Dean to reopen the cathedral now without looking very stupid so long as the camp stays.
And to get themselves out of this mess of their own making they have to go to court to evict people from land they do not own; whose ownership is unknown, and where there is no sign at all of any breach of the peace occurring.
And there are those who say #occupylondon has no apparent aims? Well it has so far made very clear that St Paul's and the City are very definitely on the back foot, panicking and out of control in their desire to oppress the ordinary people of this country and their democratic rights.
You're in trouble Dean.
Stop digging.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
There is one simple attatitude, and one simple action that would get the cathedral out of trouble.
The attitude is humility, admitting their mistake.
The action is support the protest and reopening, at the same time stating that their Health and Safety concerns were misguided and have now been fully addressed.
Glad you had fun Richard. I’m planning on visiting #occupybristol this week. Should be educational!
Gustavo Gutiérrez said that:
“Poverty is not fate, it is a condition; it is not a misfortune, it is an injustice. It is the result of social structures and mental and cultural categories, it is linked to the way in which society has been built, in its various manifestations.”
It is the result of unjust and sinful social structures & it creates the horrible, human, problem that among the poor there is (again quoting Gutierrez) an “absence of recognition of their own human dignity and of their condition as daughters and sons of God”.
So, put simply, a mode of government such as the one the Right propose, a “free market” model which, by definition, requires great wealth & poverty to coexist , is not compatible with the teachings of Christ.
The people on St Paul’s commitee, who work in the City,(so sweet & so pretty etc – I’ll give up rhyming) need to articulate how exactly they believe free market capitalism is able to comply with Jesus’ gospel, because I’m convinced they can’t do it. Neo-liberalism & Christianity are mutually exclusive.
I agree
You talk of democracy, yet we’ll all see the undermining of democracy later today when the Government use ‘whips’ to force MP’s to vote along party lines, and to ignore the wishes of their constituents – who in most cases they have not consulted anyway.
Why not flush out names behind the political pressure you suggest is behind the closure. Start with the clown Londoner’s elected as Mayor – What are your views on the situation Boris?
Thank you for this is precise, clear and dynamic reading of the situation. The #occupy movement http://bit.ly/nDdfuV needs the best possible input of this sort to inform, assist, support those courageous leaders ‘on the ground’. It is astonishing how quick, widespread and diverse are the groups springing up, wishing to connect and collaborate – including ‘occupy silicon valley’ http://on.fb.me/opWh3s and, astonishingly, ‘occupy marines’ http://bit.ly/qUPyNc.
This is a transformative global movement and as it is put down, brutally, in one place (Syria, Egypt) it is springing up somewhere else. It is using IT and the web as a connecting tool.
For me, your most challenging comment is:
I believe in practical, pragmatic, deliverable politics. And I believe there is a very great deal that those with empathic concern for the people of this country can demand. I’ll come back to some of those issues soon
I’m sure you’re right and I look forward to your guidance. But, just as with the extraordinarily important Transition Network http://www.transitionnetwork.org/, this is a necessary but not sufficient call. It seems to me that we have to look globally locally and systemically or holistically as well as focussing on particular and achievable goals.
It is for that reason that I find the Earth Charter http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/ such an inspiring and important document, since it enables us to focus on particular issues and concerns while providing a framework into which we can fit others closely, or, sometimes rather more distantly connected.
Your work, together with that of Nick Shaxson and John Christensen, for example, concentrates, I think, on Principle 10: Ensure that economic activities and institutions at all levels promote human development in an equitable and sustainable manner and, specifically, d. Require multinational corporations and international financial organizations to act transparently in the public good, and hold them accountable for the consequences of their activities.
I think it’s now time for me, like the dormouse, to go back to sleep!
The fact that the Church of England is currently re-negotiating the number of (unelected) bishops it gets in the House of Lords is of course nothing to do with this.
Neoliberalism may be incompatible with Christianity, but established religion is certainly incompatible with democracy.
seems like all the political classes are against true and honest debate, why ?
and why does a disparate group of people have to fight so hard to be heard, there voice is pure of thought and helpful in there desire to make the world a better place.
Clearly that’s not in the church’s interests – why ?
Further to my comment above, someone has just suggested that the reason the #occupy movement appears such a threat to the ‘establishment’ is precisely because they are NOT making specific demands
Hello Richard
Thanks for writing up your views on the protest. I spent most of Saturday visiting the protest camp and was very impressed with how well organised and pleasant the protest is, a very gentle and safe carnival atmosphere.
As a Public Health Engineer I would find it extremely difficult to fault the protest camp – fire escape passages, fencing around the generators, excellent hygiene in the kitchens, portaloos, all possible effort has been made to ensure health and safety and to mitigate any risks to the cathedral and its staff, the general public and the protestors themselves.
It is disingenuous at the very least for the Dean to have closed the cathedral on the grounds stated. The current risks due to the protestors are considerably less than they would be on a busy “normal” Sunday or whenever there is an event within the Cathedral. And it would be simply untrue to suggest that there is any impediment to the general public entering the cathedral, or to the staff in carrying out their duties.
May I encourage people to write directly to the Cathedral management to implore them to review their decision, which is clearly but unreasonably intended to put pressure on the protestors to move on. Surely the huge, world-reknowned Cathedral of St Paul’s in the City of London can put up with a few tents and posters in its shadows.
Please write to:
canonpastor@stpaulscathedral.org.uk,
chancellor@stpaulscathedral.org.uk,
marko@stpaulscathedral.org.uk,
michaelh@stpaulscathedral.org.uk
Best regards
Albert Jones
I heard you on Radio 4’s PM programme today
You came across very well, I thought. Much better than Conservative MP Matthew Hancock you were debating with.
The only point he seemed able to make was “the protesters have shut down St Pauls”, and seemed unable to repond to your points..
Conservative Campaign Headquarters (or who ever does the job) do not seem to be a very good at briefing people before media interviews.
BBC iPlayer link for that http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b0167zks
Thanks for this and your comments
[…] closure of St Pauls Cathedral because of Occupy London and the resignation of Giles Fraser) Richard Murphy – The hole St Paul’s has dig itself into Alan Rusbridger – Canon of St Paul’s: church cannot answer peaceful protest with […]