These are my links for January 21st through January 23rd:
- FT.com | Willem Buiter’s Maverecon | Can the UK government stop the UK banking system going down the snyrting without risking a sovereign debt crisis? - Worth reading
I don't share all his views - but his comparisons with Iceland are scary and appropriate
And he gets to the right place - nationalisation is the ONLY option
- FT.com / Companies / Technology - Details of alleged Satyam fraud emerge - "The former chairman of Satyam Computer Services inflated the size of the outsourcing company’s workforce by nearly one-quarter and siphoned off the wages of the fake employees, Indian authorities have claimed."
And PWC did not notice?
Come on - this is first year auditing stuff
Trouble is, they probably put a first year on it
Never doubt the rubbish that the big firms pass off as an audit
- FT.com / Companies / Financial Services - Santander fund praised ‘impeccable’ Madoff - People should be asking more questions of Santander I say
- FT.com / Companies / Banks - BofA axes Thain as Merrill deal sours - The facts are simple
The banks deceived themselves as well as us
The opacity and complexity of offshore meant they did not know what they were doing. Someone coming in could not find out
The answer is available: ban the use of offshore, orphan structures and any form of off balance sheet securitisation for now
Isn't that glaringly obvious?
- FT.com / World - Obama ushers in an ‘era of openness’ - The headline works for me
So be it
That's my wish
- FT.com / Companies - Ebay hit by fall in consumer spending - No sector is immune
- FT.com / Companies - Parsons takes over as Citi chairman - "Dick Parsons, former chief executive of Time Warner, was last night named to replace Sir Win Bischoff as chairman of Citigroup, after the US bank’s fortunes failed to recover despite a $300bn government bail-out in November.
Mr Parsons, who was Citi’s lead director and has been on the board since 1996, immediately urged the Obama administration not to nationalise the country’s ailing banks and called for the creation of a government-controlled “bad bank” to buy toxic assets."
Using other people's money without having a duty of care to them is a toxic mix.
Banks have already proven they do not accept the duty of care to a diverse shareholder base.
They don' accept one to government
That's why it will have to be imposed on them
- FT.com / Companies - Merrill delivered bonuses before BofA deal - Crooks
- FT.com / Companies / UK companies - Brown attacked over Northern Rock bonuses - We have to recreate the idea that salary is enough
You should do a good job for what you're paid
What is wrong with that?
- Germany hopes Zumwinkel case will pressure tax havens - One of Germany's business stars will answer charges of tax dodging when he appears in court on Thursday in a case the government hopes will increase pressure on havens such as Liechtenstein and Switzerland.
Klaus Zumwinkel, whose Liechtenstein trust was uncovered when the government paid an informant for a bank disk containing the name of the former Deutsche Post chief and others, will also be confronted with files found during dawn raids on his home. - Tax Justice Network: New German anti-tax haven law - Germany moves against the tax havens - more good news
- Savers need tax breaks, says Barclays Boss - Accountancy Age - a) Savings does not equal investment
b) This helps Barclays more than anyone
c) Savings are not needed right now - they fuel deflation
So as usual a banker has got it wrong
Let's ignore him - it's the only thing to do
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
“So as usual a banker has got it wrong [on savings]”
The banks want capital to shore up their losses.
The government wants capital to cover their debts and spend more.
The shops want capital through sales to survive.
The public want capital to pay rising food and fuel bills; to pay back record mortgages; to pay back record credit card debt.
If the banks are nationalised some of their losses are transferred from wealthy creditors to the taxpayer rather than being written off. If we are to have a national bank why not just let private banks fail and use the Bank of England to choose where to lend and what to support directly?
Why buy a failed industry laden with debt and a workforce skilled in misrepresentation? Why burden the taxpayer further? This is taking money from the competent to support the incompetent.
Stefan
Because it’s getting to the point where their infrastructure is worth paying for
And we’ll pick up the liabilities anyway
That’s why
Richard