The FT has reported:
Borrowing from Donald Rumsfeld, the former US defence secretary, he said such purchases would be "unconventional unconventional measures" designed to increase liquidity and trading and reduce the spread of corporate bond yields over government bonds.
These differed from "conventional unconventional" policy, in which the Bank created money to buy assets with the aim of increasing the stock of money in the economy and the availability of credit while also raising spending. Although the Bank's monetary policy committee was not ready to use this weapon yet, he said, if inflation was likely to remain too low the MPC "might wish to adopt these unconventional measures as an instrument of monetary policy".
Sorry - in this case this is just wrong.
I'm all in favour of reducing the long term interest rate. We need to do that.
But we also need to see that the crisis we have is not just a financial issue. We also have an energy crisis, a climate change crisis, a baby boom generation who want pensions and who miserably failed to deliver an infrastructure in fine fettle to the succeeding generations that will justify paying them for their past efforts, and more besides.
In the circumstances buying up corporate bonds really is a case of throwing good money after bad. Why inject money into the economy buying assets that people think of little worth when we could instead be piling money into real things.
As someone said yesterday:
That's what this cash should be used for: real jobs for real people. By all means do quantitative easing. But do it with government bonds. It's government cash that is going to get this economy going, get our businesses going with the demand which only government can create right now, and which will deliver what people need right now.
When will the Bank of England and Treasury learn?