If it is true that VAT is to be cut by 2.5% to 15% in today's pre-Budget report this is a mistake.
The cost is reported to be £12.5 billion, a proportionate part of the £84 billion the tax was meant to raise this year. This will make such a cut a major part of any stimulus package. But this will not solve the real problems in the UK economy.
There are several reasons why this is so. First, let's be realistic. On an item costing £4.99 the VAT saving will be under 11p. Can you see anyone shifting that price to £4.89?
On £500 (VAT inclusive price) the saving is £10.60. That's neither here or there: if you are going to spend £500 then £10.60 or so will not change the decision. Other influences are much stronger.
So at low price points this is a boost for the retailer who will take much of the gain. I really do not expect them to pass this on. At high price points I doubt the impact.
Either way the saving goes to marginal jobs in the UK, and Woolworths won't be saved by this, whilst cheap imports are the only likely sector to see a boost. The business to business sector will see none at all: VAT does not impact them.
But it's more than that: this might fuel deflation, which we can ill afford. So it's a mistake.
VAT is regressive, but not as badly as some taxes (e.g. council tax) so the poorest who need help will not benefit most.
And VAT will be hard to raise again.
When we badly needed jobs we get a credit boost when credit is in short supply and the government is taking no action with the banks to make it available. Nothing about this makes sense.
We could work our way out of a recession with the right boost for new jobs: the one thing we can't do is spend our way out of recession and yet that is exactly what the government is trying to do.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
[…] will need to get the balance right between tax cuts and increases in public spending. Some on the progressive end of the debate have argued against any tax cuts as they will end up […]
[…] have already criticised VAT cuts: I stand by that analysis. I am afraid that this is the wrong fiscal stimulus for the […]
Thanks Richard,
I agree that low priced goods are unlikely to be reduced in price, but I don’t understand why the price reduction in higher priced goods, which you agree _will_ take effect, won’t stimulate aggregate demand, even though it may not appear to make much difference from an individual point of view. Surely it is these small changes in aggregate demand which really have economic effect. For example, a reduction in income tax which some prefer, would stimulate growth through the mechanism of aggregate demand, even though, again from an individual perspective, having an extra percent or two may not make much difference.
I therefore think your first point is very well made, but remain to be convinced by your second.
best, Stephen
[…] Richard Murphy points out, cutting VAT by such a small amount isn’t likely to impact upon retail prices for […]