As the FT has noted:
How do you define "toxic"? That is the $700bn question hanging over Washington and Wall Street.
The answer is of course is that it's any loss making stuff the banks have they want to dump on the state so they can carry on as before.
Isn't that obvious? This scheme is designed by a Goldman's man.
And this is precisely why the terms have to be harsh.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
